Thanks, that is exactly what I was getting at.

I'd say in the reference doc, just after

* Introduction to graph Computing
** Primary components of the TinkerPop3 structure API

[image showing the in and out vertex]

Thanks
Pieter



On 14/12/2015 14:23, Stephen Mallette wrote:
> i updated the image:
>
> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.1.1-SNAPSHOT/tutorials/getting-started/
>
> not sure where this should go in the reference docs - i guess in
> Introduction to Graph Computing maybe?  reading over the section it doesn't
> fit in "easily" without some surrounding text.  I kinda think we should
> refer people to Getting Started in that section rather than re-write a lot
> of what I wrote. Or does it go somewhere else more naturally than in that
> section?
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:24 AM, pieter-gmail <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I would say it should be in the reference doc also.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Pieter
>>
>> On 14/12/2015 13:04, Stephen Mallette wrote:
>>> oh - i see.  i go into that in some detail in "Getting Started" in the
>>> "Next Fifteen MInutes" section.  I could make that more clear there.
>> What
>>> if i added "out vertex" and "in vertex" to 1 and 3 in that first image in
>>> that section?  would that be good?  or do you think we should include
>>> something in the reference docs too?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:52 AM, pieter-gmail <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry, should have been more explicit.
>>>>
>>>> Slide 24 shows a diagram illustrating on an edge the direction and which
>>>> side is the in and which side is the out vertex.
>>>>
>>>>    person1 ----------knows----------->person2
>>>>      outV                  outE                    inV
>>>>
>>>> It will be nice if a similar illustration can be at the start of the
>>>> docs to clarify the convention regarding which side is in and out.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Pieter
>>>>
>>>> On 14/12/2015 12:42, Stephen Mallette wrote:
>>>>> I'm not sure what you mean (the link just goes to the start of marko's
>>>>> slides - can you maybe just issue a pull request to the reference docs
>>>> and
>>>>> we can review?  i assume it's not a big change you're looking for?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 4:03 AM, pieter <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Every now and again I need to confirm for myself, on an edge, which
>> side
>>>>>> is the in and out vertex.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The current modern graph docs does not illustrate this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @marko slides
>>>>>> <
>>>>>>
>> http://www.slideshare.net/slidarko/acm-dbpl-keynote-the-graph-traversal-machine-and-language
>>>>>> here does.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It will be useful if the current docs can also illustrate this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>> Pieter
>>>>>>
>>

Reply via email to