+1 for the 2nd. Looks much cleaner IMO. Cheers, Daniel
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Dylan Millikin <dylan.milli...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm running a few tests as per marko's suggestions. I'm in need of a bit of > help in the form of your opinions on these three images. They're three > different ways of displaying output: > > GremlinBin standard console output. This is roughly how it is today and is > my personal favorite: > > http://i982.photobucket.com/albums/ae305/DylanMillikin/Screen%20Shot%202016-04-09%20at%2012.24.13_zpsymbn7cr0.png > > Terminal console which is the same as the terminal, I find the readability > lower here but it's homogenous with the actual console: > > http://i982.photobucket.com/albums/ae305/DylanMillikin/Screen%20Shot%202016-04-09%20at%2012.25.09_zpselrb46mb.png > > Terminal with bold query : > > http://i982.photobucket.com/albums/ae305/DylanMillikin/Screen%20Shot%202016-04-09%20at%2012.25.41_zpsbr985qvb.png > > My stance is probably biased by the fact that I spend limited time using > the actual Gremlin console. Which do you guys prefer? > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Dylan Millikin <dylan.milli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Awesome feedback Marko. Daniel had brought some of these up as well : > > https://github.com/PommeVerte/gremlin-bin/issues/16 > > > > I was waiting to finalize the console JS part and open sourcing it as > some > > of the stuff you asked aren't possible on the current system. I will be > > upgrading GremlinBin with it today. > > > > I really like the idea of being able to select your graph from a visual > > set. and I don't mind getting rid of the create your own section. > > > > Regarding your points: > > > > 1. This is now possible and easy to add. > > 2. I kept the line breaks to make the json readable but couldn't make > > separate behaviors for json vs text. Now with the update this should also > > be possible. > > 3. I would like to think about this a bit more. I'm not against the idea, > > I just had plans for the right section of the input bar so I'll need to > see > > how I could adapt. > > 4. This can be done now as well. > > 5. I have some sandboxing issues/reservations here. Once I work through > > them I can do this. > > 6. That's a really good idea. > > > > One last note about the grateful-dead graph. The current visualization > > system chokes on the graph. So this is going to take a bit more work > > because it requires a viz update. > > > > I should be implementing some of these over the weekend. And I will > > announce the js console release at the beginning of next week. > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Dylan, > >> > >> I've been seeing Gremlinbin in action a lot lately (mainly through > >> Daniel's answers to users on the mailing list). I like it, of course, > but > >> there are a few things that still bug me about it that I think (if you > also > >> think) would make it better. Here is the laundry list. > >> > >> -------------------- > >> > >> The + (New) page is really janky 1990's HTML form-cheesy looking. > >> > >> We have a graphic for each graph you display there. > >> > >> > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.1.1-incubating/images/tinkerpop-modern.png > >> > >> > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.1.1-incubating/images/the-crew-graph.png > >> ** I would not provide classic. Just modern. No reason to > confuse > >> people. > >> ** You should also provide the GratefulDead graph with the > >> visualization being its schema: > >> > >> > http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.1.1-incubating/images/grateful-dead-schema.png > >> > >> I don't know what good UI trick to use, but to have it where people can > >> look at the graphic when selecting which graph to use would be neat. > This > >> pull down form menu is just really fuggly and what does "modern" mean? … > >> "crew" ? … Maybe even have a little blurb of text under each graphic > saying > >> what the graph is about?…. > >> > >> Next, the "create your own" is sort weird. I don't think it should be > >> there. If people want to create their own, they would choose empty graph > >> and then in the console do their addV(), addE() mutations traversals to > >> create the graph (and see it visualized as they are creating it!). > >> > >> Finally, perhaps a little Gremlin character on this page to give it some > >> pizazz. > >> > >> -------------------- > >> > >> The console area should really really really (really) look identical to > >> the Gremlin Console. > >> > >> 1. Start off with the \___/ Gremlin ASCII character and all. > >> 2. There shouldn't be line breaks between the gremlin> lines. > >> 3. You should type your query at the bottom, not at the top. > >> 4. You should break up the graph loading into multiple steps: > >> gremlin> graph = TinkerGraph.open() > >> gremlin> graph = graph.traversal() > >> 5. You should not use TinkerFactory as newbies will go "uhhh?". Perhaps > >> load from GraphML or GraphSON. > >> gremlin> graph.io(graphml()).readGraph('data/the-crew.xml') > >> 6. The console area should have an option to export the graph as > GraphML, > >> GraphSON, or Gryo. This way people can take their graph with them. > >> > >> -------------------- > >> > >> > >> Anywho, just some thoughts. If any of them resonate with you, I can add > >> them to your issue tracker. Just tell me which, if any. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Marko. > >> > >> http://markorodriguez.com > >> > >> > > >
