Hi, I like the second too. Then the third.
Marko. > On Apr 9, 2016, at 4:48 AM, Daniel Kuppitz <m...@gremlin.guru> wrote: > > +1 for the 2nd. Looks much cleaner IMO. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > > On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Dylan Millikin <dylan.milli...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I'm running a few tests as per marko's suggestions. I'm in need of a bit of >> help in the form of your opinions on these three images. They're three >> different ways of displaying output: >> >> GremlinBin standard console output. This is roughly how it is today and is >> my personal favorite: >> >> http://i982.photobucket.com/albums/ae305/DylanMillikin/Screen%20Shot%202016-04-09%20at%2012.24.13_zpsymbn7cr0.png >> >> Terminal console which is the same as the terminal, I find the readability >> lower here but it's homogenous with the actual console: >> >> http://i982.photobucket.com/albums/ae305/DylanMillikin/Screen%20Shot%202016-04-09%20at%2012.25.09_zpselrb46mb.png >> >> Terminal with bold query : >> >> http://i982.photobucket.com/albums/ae305/DylanMillikin/Screen%20Shot%202016-04-09%20at%2012.25.41_zpsbr985qvb.png >> >> My stance is probably biased by the fact that I spend limited time using >> the actual Gremlin console. Which do you guys prefer? >> >> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:32 PM, Dylan Millikin <dylan.milli...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Awesome feedback Marko. Daniel had brought some of these up as well : >>> https://github.com/PommeVerte/gremlin-bin/issues/16 >>> >>> I was waiting to finalize the console JS part and open sourcing it as >> some >>> of the stuff you asked aren't possible on the current system. I will be >>> upgrading GremlinBin with it today. >>> >>> I really like the idea of being able to select your graph from a visual >>> set. and I don't mind getting rid of the create your own section. >>> >>> Regarding your points: >>> >>> 1. This is now possible and easy to add. >>> 2. I kept the line breaks to make the json readable but couldn't make >>> separate behaviors for json vs text. Now with the update this should also >>> be possible. >>> 3. I would like to think about this a bit more. I'm not against the idea, >>> I just had plans for the right section of the input bar so I'll need to >> see >>> how I could adapt. >>> 4. This can be done now as well. >>> 5. I have some sandboxing issues/reservations here. Once I work through >>> them I can do this. >>> 6. That's a really good idea. >>> >>> One last note about the grateful-dead graph. The current visualization >>> system chokes on the graph. So this is going to take a bit more work >>> because it requires a viz update. >>> >>> I should be implementing some of these over the weekend. And I will >>> announce the js console release at the beginning of next week. >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Marko Rodriguez <okramma...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Dylan, >>>> >>>> I've been seeing Gremlinbin in action a lot lately (mainly through >>>> Daniel's answers to users on the mailing list). I like it, of course, >> but >>>> there are a few things that still bug me about it that I think (if you >> also >>>> think) would make it better. Here is the laundry list. >>>> >>>> -------------------- >>>> >>>> The + (New) page is really janky 1990's HTML form-cheesy looking. >>>> >>>> We have a graphic for each graph you display there. >> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.1.1-incubating/images/tinkerpop-modern.png >> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.1.1-incubating/images/the-crew-graph.png >>>> ** I would not provide classic. Just modern. No reason to >> confuse >>>> people. >>>> ** You should also provide the GratefulDead graph with the >>>> visualization being its schema: >> http://tinkerpop.apache.org/docs/3.1.1-incubating/images/grateful-dead-schema.png >>>> >>>> I don't know what good UI trick to use, but to have it where people can >>>> look at the graphic when selecting which graph to use would be neat. >> This >>>> pull down form menu is just really fuggly and what does "modern" mean? … >>>> "crew" ? … Maybe even have a little blurb of text under each graphic >> saying >>>> what the graph is about?…. >>>> >>>> Next, the "create your own" is sort weird. I don't think it should be >>>> there. If people want to create their own, they would choose empty graph >>>> and then in the console do their addV(), addE() mutations traversals to >>>> create the graph (and see it visualized as they are creating it!). >>>> >>>> Finally, perhaps a little Gremlin character on this page to give it some >>>> pizazz. >>>> >>>> -------------------- >>>> >>>> The console area should really really really (really) look identical to >>>> the Gremlin Console. >>>> >>>> 1. Start off with the \___/ Gremlin ASCII character and all. >>>> 2. There shouldn't be line breaks between the gremlin> lines. >>>> 3. You should type your query at the bottom, not at the top. >>>> 4. You should break up the graph loading into multiple steps: >>>> gremlin> graph = TinkerGraph.open() >>>> gremlin> graph = graph.traversal() >>>> 5. You should not use TinkerFactory as newbies will go "uhhh?". Perhaps >>>> load from GraphML or GraphSON. >>>> gremlin> graph.io(graphml()).readGraph('data/the-crew.xml') >>>> 6. The console area should have an option to export the graph as >> GraphML, >>>> GraphSON, or Gryo. This way people can take their graph with them. >>>> >>>> -------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> Anywho, just some thoughts. If any of them resonate with you, I can add >>>> them to your issue tracker. Just tell me which, if any. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Marko. >>>> >>>> http://markorodriguez.com >>
