Mladen Turk wrote:
So, from my point of view I see this vote as useless, because
anyone can create a connector using what ever technology he prefers.
The only valid question would be, what to use as a default one,
but that's a minor issue thought.
As Mladen says, anyone can create a connector.
Therefore, let the best connector win on its merits and let those in the
know pursue what they believe to be the best connector approach based on
their experience.
Yes, I was one of those who asked about NIO's prospects in Tomcat way
back when -- as it seemed worthwhile to me to fully examine a pure Java
solution. I was arguably offbase as I do not have the level of
experience in this area that Mladen, Remy, et al, have, but at any rate
there was a good deal of NIO investigation around that time and the
results were that NIO did not measure up.
Until someone figures out a way to make NIO measure up to APR and
produces numbers to show it, APR deserves to be the default.
I would actually guess that the "use NIO not APR" chant comes primarily
from those who then need APR on platforms for which they do not have APR
binaries and don't want to deal with building or finding it -- yet want
optimal performance.
--
Jess Holle
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
