Remy Maucherat wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Author: markt >> Date: Tue Jan 10 15:06:22 2006 >> New Revision: 367826 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=367826&view=rev >> Log: >> Alternative patch for bug 29214 based on Remy's comments > > > I didn't have time to look into it much, but I would have thought using > coyoteResponse.getContentLength() != -1 would be more good enough. > Otherwise, the code isn't really that much simpler.
I thought about doing it that way but I wanted to catch the difference between Content-Length defaulting to -1 and the page developer explicitly setting it to -1. It is an edge case I admit but I don't see any harm in covering it given where the implementation now sits. Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
