2006/4/6, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Jess Holle wrote: > > Henri Gomez wrote: > >> > > We recently saw a customer run into this limitation in that all of their > > headers, etc, would not fit in the first 8K. > > > > Waiting for a new AJP version sounds like a non-starter. Can we just > > have something like a JkOption that allows one to explicitly opt into > > this arrangement? Address this for mod_jk and Tomcat and one is done > > for now (though a mod_proxy_ajp shouldn't be far behind). > > -1. > > Guys we are talking about protocol! > Saying that one part can send a 32K while the other > part is expecting 8K will in most cases lead to core dump. > > If the size is larger then 8K, this is not an AJP13 protocol > any more, and I'll be -1 on any attempt to extend the packet size. > Like said, we can talk about AJP14, but AJP13 is well established > protocol, and ideas that tries to break it will never pass.
Well configuring as I said previousy, settings buffer sire in mod_jk (via jkOptions or others way) couldn't be done without doing/settings the same on the Tomcat side. And that code is not present today in jk of course, but need to be introduce in all the Tomcat base (3.3/4.0/4.1/5.0 and 5.5). May be the better will be to discuss what should be the foundation of AJP13 successor. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
