Hi, Picking up this thread again I see a range of views. "main" seems to be the most popular although several folks suggested "10.0.x" and "use whatever GitHub use". There was also interest in "trunk". Particularly with the additional suggestion of "10.0.x" appearing in the middle of the discussion, I'm not sure where consensus lies at the moment.
One suggestion I particularly liked was to do the rename at the point we branch 10.0.x and start on 10.1.x since we will need to be updating CI and various things anyway. That is currently looking like September as that is the target date for the Jakarta EE 9 release. I suspect that this could get tricky as I'd prefer "main" or "10.0.x", could work with "trunk" but really don't want to continue with "master". I imagine others have similar views in different combinations. Maybe if others express their views in a similar way to the above we'll end up with a natural consensus. If not, we'll have to figure something out. Mark On 19/06/2020 16:32, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 16/06/2020 à 10:02, Mark Thomas a écrit : > >> Thoughts? > > I'd prefer the status-quo and keep "master", I've always understood this > as the 'master record' (I know it might be historically wrong) and I > haven't seen evidences it has ever offended or deterred anyone from > contributing. > > If there is a consensus to change I suggest waiting to see what GitHub > plans to do. The "master" name is a de-facto standard for Git > repositories, and I think we should remain consistent with the new name > that will be popularized by GitHub. > > That said, I have a preference for "main". > > Emmanuel Bourg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
