You are missing nothing. Feel free to scratch :)
Regards,
Rainer
Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Aug 2, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
And in fact it doesn't matter. I found it more logical, to have
JK_STATUS_ERROR and JK_STATUS_FATAL_ERROR closer together (for those
reading the code). The constants are not used outside JK, so there is
no compatibility problem.
It looks like your are closely following todays JK changes. I really
appreciate that! Unless you find problems, I just now commited my last
change (hopefully) for 1.2.25.
A other little nit: The see a few places where
we have things like (in jk_lb_worker.c for example):
&(p->lb_workers[0].s->route[0])
Can't they simply be reduced to
p->lb_workers[0].s->route
?
Not exactly sure what I'm missing there...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
