On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Costin Manolache wrote:
>  > I understand people using JDBC authenticator would miss the connection
>  > pooling - but maybe they could download it separately ? Would't be
>  > easier to just download the 'official' version ?
>
>  No. commons-dbcp supports far more than just pooling for the JDBC
>  authenticator. The reason we do the renaming is to avoid class loading
>  issues when users want to use a Tomcat-managed connection pool alongside an
>  application that uses commons-dbcp and/or commons-pool directly.
>
>
>  > I'm also curious, assuming JDK1.5 is used to compile - would the
>  > tomcat distro work in JDK1.6 if dbcp is compiled with 1.5 ?
>
>  Yes it does. To be more accurate, I haven't seen any issues using the
>  re-packaged DBCP on 1.6.
>
>
>  > In any case - it kind of sucks to not be able to build following the
>  > instructions ( ant download, ant ) - I didn't find any ref that JDK1.6
>  > is not supported for build.
>
>  Correct.
>
>  If you want to fix this you could always port the DBCP build fixes from
>  commons.
>

This isssue is being tracked as DBCP-191.  Comments, suggestions,
patches are welcome on the ticket or on commons-dev.  Opinions on JDK
support levels/branching from tomcat perspective would be appreciated.

Phil

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to