On 22/10/2010 06:27, Tim Funk wrote: > (1) Since we already have > - effectiveMajorVersion > - effectiveMinorVersion > > Is Context.version a "good name" to use? Since the name version is also > used by the servlet spec? Would "revision" be a less confusing name? (Or > webappRevision).
Good point. Maybe webappVersion? > (2) > [I thought of this as a side effect of reading the patch ...] > > Would it be a good idea if Tomcat by default always has a default ROOT > webapp? Then we can guarantee a webapp is always mapped and we can let > that webapp handle the 404 error. This might simplify some of the mapper > and adapter code. So if there is no default webapp - tomcat inserts the > default. Another good point. Maybe just use the default servlet? Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
