On 2 September 2014 20:25, Filip Hanik <fi...@hanik.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Rémy Maucherat <r...@apache.org> wrote: > >> 2014-09-02 18:41 GMT+02:00 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>: >> >> > I'm leaning towards A myself. >> > > > The move to git clears a huge hurdle, and that is managing contributions. > The patch system is very difficult, and impossible to maintain. A pull > request stays alive > and can be maintained through code changes > . I believe we can get more contributions by moving to Git. > > > >> > >> >> Oh wow, does this mean I can resurrect my thread on Maven too ? (ideally, >> we should also move to it first, then think about how to use it later, >> otherwise people will never vote in favor) >> > > Let's skip Maven and move straight to Gradle, it has the benefit of not > needing a build system installed on the developers machine, as it gets > downloaded by the wrapper checked into the repo. This is yet one less
AIUI the wrapper is not source, it is binary. Generally only source code is allowed in repos, so will this cause an issue? > version that is required by the contributor. > It's built on top of Ant, and should give us all the flexibility we need. > > >> >> :) >> >> Rémy >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
