@David: any idea when you'll do the xml stuff? basically i can wait the end of the week but no more (> 3 months, a bunch of rewrite about classloaders, serialization etc, nothing we can put in 1.5.x but absolutely mandatory for a bunch of use cases).
*Romain Manni-Bucau* *Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>* *Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> *LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau* *Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau* 2013/3/25 Bjorn Danielsson <[email protected]> > I actually ran GlassFish v2.1 on a Nokia N900 phone a couple of > years ago, on OpenJDK for ARM. It was horribly slow, TomEE would > be a breeze in comparison :) > > -- > Bjorn Danielsson > Cuspy Code AB > > > dsh <[email protected]> wrote: > > I suppose Raspberry Pi support relates to getting TomEE to work on the > > Oracle Java SE embedded for ARM platforms [1]? If so I am interested, but > > would like to see the task to be extended to ARM platform support for > TomEE > > including the Raspberry Pi. Frankly, I am not a big fan of all the hype > > around Raspberry Pi. There are other, great boards such as the beagle > board > > that actually drives the Ninja Blocks [2], an internet of things device, > > where TomEE as well would make great sense. > > > > [1] > http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/java/raspberrypi-1704896.html > > [2] http://ninjablocks.com/ > > > > Cheers > > Daniel > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 7:48 PM, David Blevins <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> I'd also like to get the raspberry pi support in better condition and > make > >> a huge splash... > >> > >> -David > >> > >> On Mar 25, 2013, at 6:46 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > 2 notes. There needs to be some communication on the list before > >> starting a release. > >> > > >> > On 1.6.0 specifically, I'd like to finish getting the xml stuff > switched > >> over before we release 1.6.0 > >> > > >> > Not the kind of thing I think we should be doing in a maintenance > branch > >> or we would have done it in 1.5.2 and don't want to wait for 1.7.0 > >> > > >> > > >> > -David > >> > > >> > >> >
