But no more the tomee one without copying code. (once again not blocking)
Le 4 déc. 2013 09:35, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <jeano...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> But, the main objective of shading is to let users embed their own Quartz
> if I understood without interfering with TomEE internals.
> So if they embed it, where is the issue? They gonna be able to
> extend/implement whatever they want to.
>
> JLouis
>
>
> 2013/12/3 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>
> > quartz api (interfaces/abstract classes) are sometimes used by users.
> > If we shade we can't use default impl. Not blocking for me, was mainly
> > a warning
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/12/3 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeano...@gmail.com>:
> > > Did not get time to dig into, was just my first feeling. Could you
> > > elaborate a bit more?
> > > Not sure I understood the extension issue?
> > >
> > > JLouis
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/12/3 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > >> The 3rd ;). The issue is we loose all quartz extensions then
> > >> Le 3 déc. 2013 10:10, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <jeano...@gmail.com> a
> > écrit :
> > >>
> > >> > Maybe the second (shaded) one is easier to manage at first glance.
> > >> > So that is my preferred solution
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > 2013/12/3 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > >> >
> > >> > > Ps: forgot another solutuon: shade quartz in
> > org.apache.openejb.quartz
> > >> > > Le 2 déc. 2013 22:23, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >
> > a
> > >> > > écrit :
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > How do we handle quartz for next releases? It is very often a
> pain
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I propose:
> > >> > > > 1) if in openejb loader use this one
> > >> > > > 2) if not look for it in tomee/quartz/*.jar and create a loader
> > with
> > >> it
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Tomee would use 2 by default
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Wdyt?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Jean-Louis
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>

Reply via email to