well actually we can just activate the "fast" profile by default and keep the current default for CI (that's already the case since -Pall-adapters is only on buildbot)
Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-03-29 16:43 GMT+01:00 helio frota <[email protected]>: > If we move the examples out to their own "repo" and mirrored it on Github, > we might get a lot more contributions. > > +1 > > Thoughts? > > IMHO, examples are not part of a project, in the meaning of "to build" > and/or "to validate". > For me, the validation is a real project in production, joining all > "examples" in a real project to catch a lot of problems as possible. > > Other thing is the community... a lot of new people never used SVN before, > put examples on github to get more feedback and more contributions, can > open a large door for TomEE. So, the project can have a lot of contributors > and accelerate more the community "X factor". > > I guess the dev team need to think/remember about this: "No community, no > success". Community is a little bit diff from just users. > > > thanks > > > > > > ------------------------------------------- > http://eprogramming.github.io > > > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Jonathan Gallimore < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> It wouldn't surprise me if that's already there. :) >> >> If that's the case, it's probably worth a mention here: >> http://tomee.apache.org/dev/source-code.html >> >> Happy to add that when I get a chance to get on the computer this evening. >> >> Jon >> >> > On 29 Mar 2014, at 09:34, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > isnt it what does main profile? >> > Romain Manni-Bucau >> > Twitter: @rmannibucau >> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> > >> > >> > >> > 2014-03-29 10:33 GMT+01:00 Jonathan Gallimore < >> [email protected]>: >> >> Good points I think. I'd like to see a quicker build, but having those >> tests as part of the main build is useful. >> >> >> >> Maybe we can exclude them with a profile and publish the Maven command >> to build without them? Might be a simple solution to get the best of both >> worlds? >> >> >> >> Jon >> >> >> >>> On 29 Mar 2014, at 08:55, Andy <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> I agree with Romain that the example tests are an important way of >> judging if the build is stable. In the past I have always based internal >> releases on them all passing. >> >>> >> >>> If we moved them then I'd still like to see them on the buildbot. >> >>> >> >>> We could also just leave them in trunk and mirror just the examples so >> that we can merge changes back. >> >>> >> >>>> On 29.03.2014 09:37, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> >>>> -100 excepted if for *each* example you move tests to main build too. >> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >>>> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> >>>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> >>>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> >>>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> 2014-03-29 9:35 GMT+01:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>: >> >>>>> +1 >> >>>>> Le 29 mars 2014 06:01, "Thiago Veronezi" <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> +1 >> >>>>>> Was chatting with Gerhard at JavaLand and he mentioned moving >> examples to >> >>>>>> its own section of the repository. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> In our github mirror, we actually have quite a few people looking >> (110 >> >>>>>> forks, 34 stars) >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> - https://github.com/apache/tomee >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> If we move the examples out to their own "repo" and mirrored it on >> Github, >> >>>>>> we might get a lot more contributions. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Thoughts? >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> -David >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Andy Gumbrecht >> >>> Tomitribe Corporation >> >>> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >>> >>
