happy and just able to work since soon java 8 will be the default for some enterprises cause of security constraints so we need it and we are on the way to get it :) Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-04-01 11:46 GMT+02:00 Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]>: > +1 for java 1.7 > +10 for java 1.8 > > Java 1.8 would be perfect. Even if we won't implement Java EE 8 in any time > soon, using Java 8 in Java AA applications would make some happy users. :) > > []s, > Thiago. > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> 1. -> dont see any major features actually, which ones are you thiking >> about? (just to make it clear) >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> Twitter: @rmannibucau >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >> >> >> >> 2014-04-01 8:06 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>: >> > I would say +1 for 1.7.0 in any case. >> > And I would do in 2 steps: >> > >> > 1. release the trunk as it's today. Very stable and a huge amount of >> fixes >> > and some important refactoring and add ons. Requires a 1.7.0 by itself >> and >> > not only a 1.6.1. >> > 2. upgrade to asm5 during the next 2 weeks and gather as many feedback as >> > possible on 1.7.0. We can then just push a 1.8.0 >> > >> > Right after that, we can focus on 2.0 to support java ee 7 on a new >> branch. >> > And stay with 1.x on release maintenance stage. >> > >> > We could at least maintain 1.7 and 1.! cause the code base is almost the >> > same. Only all deps (openjpa, owb, xbean, etc) changed to support java 8. >> > >> > >> > >> > 2014-04-01 7:02 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: >> > >> >> Id say +1...when well get asm5 (in progress see next lines). So just >> wait >> >> few days and we upgrade once we support it to say consistent. >> >> >> >> About asm xbean vote is in progress, owb is using the snapshot but >> already >> >> java5, openjpa has a patch for it and just wait it to be applied and our >> >> code will be updated pretty quickly so just need time. >> >> Le 1 avr. 2014 04:03, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >> >> >> > Romain had pinged me offline about the idea of upgrading our ASM >> >> > dependencies to v5 so we could support Java 8 (code compiled in Java 8 >> >> > can't be read by ASM v4 or earlier). >> >> > >> >> > This combined with the Mojarra and EclipseLink / Plume distribution >> seem >> >> > like good features for a 1.7.0 >> >> > >> >> > We also have the quartz repackaging we did which are not quite "minor" >> >> > patch changes. >> >> > >> >> > Any thoughts on updating the trunk version to 1.7? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -David >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Jean-Louis >>
