Great ! o/
------------------------------------------- http://eprogramming.github.io On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:48 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>wrote: > happy and just able to work since soon java 8 will be the default for > some enterprises cause of security constraints so we need it and we > are on the way to get it :) > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2014-04-01 11:46 GMT+02:00 Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]>: > > +1 for java 1.7 > > +10 for java 1.8 > > > > Java 1.8 would be perfect. Even if we won't implement Java EE 8 in any > time > > soon, using Java 8 in Java AA applications would make some happy users. > :) > > > > []s, > > Thiago. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected]>wrote: > > > >> 1. -> dont see any major features actually, which ones are you thiking > >> about? (just to make it clear) > >> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> Twitter: @rmannibucau > >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > >> > >> > >> > >> 2014-04-01 8:06 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>: > >> > I would say +1 for 1.7.0 in any case. > >> > And I would do in 2 steps: > >> > > >> > 1. release the trunk as it's today. Very stable and a huge amount of > >> fixes > >> > and some important refactoring and add ons. Requires a 1.7.0 by itself > >> and > >> > not only a 1.6.1. > >> > 2. upgrade to asm5 during the next 2 weeks and gather as many > feedback as > >> > possible on 1.7.0. We can then just push a 1.8.0 > >> > > >> > Right after that, we can focus on 2.0 to support java ee 7 on a new > >> branch. > >> > And stay with 1.x on release maintenance stage. > >> > > >> > We could at least maintain 1.7 and 1.! cause the code base is almost > the > >> > same. Only all deps (openjpa, owb, xbean, etc) changed to support > java 8. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > 2014-04-01 7:02 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > >> > > >> >> Id say +1...when well get asm5 (in progress see next lines). So just > >> wait > >> >> few days and we upgrade once we support it to say consistent. > >> >> > >> >> About asm xbean vote is in progress, owb is using the snapshot but > >> already > >> >> java5, openjpa has a patch for it and just wait it to be applied and > our > >> >> code will be updated pretty quickly so just need time. > >> >> Le 1 avr. 2014 04:03, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a > >> écrit : > >> >> > >> >> > Romain had pinged me offline about the idea of upgrading our ASM > >> >> > dependencies to v5 so we could support Java 8 (code compiled in > Java 8 > >> >> > can't be read by ASM v4 or earlier). > >> >> > > >> >> > This combined with the Mojarra and EclipseLink / Plume distribution > >> seem > >> >> > like good features for a 1.7.0 > >> >> > > >> >> > We also have the quartz repackaging we did which are not quite > "minor" > >> >> > patch changes. > >> >> > > >> >> > Any thoughts on updating the trunk version to 1.7? > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > -David > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Jean-Louis > >> >
