el-api has been removed already, but don't know if it has been in the good
one.

JLouis

--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com


On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:36 AM, David Blevins <[email protected]>wrote:

> We have a Tomcat flavor of the javaee-api jar, we could yank el from that
> one. (if we haven't already)
>
> I know the servlet api is not in the Tomcat flavor of the javaee-api.jar
>
> -David
>
> On May 21, 2014, at 3:10 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > btw, we should think about removing the el-api from our javaee-api
> bundle.
> >
> > The el-api is often really bound to the el-impl. E.g. the el-impl from
> JUEL also doesn't work with javax.el nor geronimo-el nor jasper-el-api...
> >
> > Liegrue,
> > strub
> >
> > On Wednesday, 21 May 2014, 11:35, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> we handle these one so there are not issues ;)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2014-05-21 11:20 GMT+02:00 agumbrecht <[email protected]>:
> >>
> >>> We also have the following to get through.
> >>>
> >>> Tomcat 7.0.54 - Which will mean reviewing and releasing the javee-api
> >>> 6.0-6-SNAPSHOT
> >>>
> >>> Release org.apache.openejb.shade:quartz-openejb-shade:2.2.1-SNAPSHOT -
> >>> Trunk
> >>> has bee using an old repo version in openejb-core that never got
> updated.
> >>>
> >>> Andy.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----
> >>>      --
> >>>      Andy Gumbrecht
> >>>
> >>>     http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>     [email protected]
> >>>     https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >>>
> >>>      TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
> >>> --
> >>> View this message in context:
> >>>
> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/TomEE-1-7-0-Branch-tp4669458p4669479.html
> >>> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to