Cool Andy. That's fine. Tkx a lot!

On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Andy Gumbrecht <[email protected]>wrote:

> I'll do it tomorrow if that's OK, mobile at the moment
> Andy.
> --
> Andy Gumbrecht http://www.tomitribe.com
> TomEE treibt Tomitribe!
> Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse my brevity.
>
> On May 22, 2014 8:10:59 PM CEST, Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >Hey guys,
> >
> >I had a quick chat with the build guys (#asftest) and it turns out I
> >just
> >need a build-admin to change the build steps for me. Who is our
> >build-admin?
> >
> >I would like to:
> >* change the 'check-formatting' step command to... mvn3 -U
> >checkstyle:check
> >-Pstyle
> >* add a new step called 'check-pmd' with... mvn3 -U pmd:check -Pstyle
> >
> >[]s,
> >Thiago.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Thiago Veronezi
> ><[email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >> Yup, no new module for style. I guess we have the same goal. :)
> >>
> >> []s,
> >> Thiago.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> the main point for me is don't add a module for style ;).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2014-05-21 17:44 GMT+02:00 Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]>:
> >>>
> >>> > >>in container/openejb-core/pom.xml?
> >>> >
> >>> > Yup, currently we have it hooked in 'openejb-core/pom.xml' and in
> >>> 'pom.xml'
> >>> > ('style' profile). The existing 'style' profile is a dummy one. I
> >will
> >>> move
> >>> > what we have in 'openejb-core/pom.xml' to the profile definition
> >in the
> >>> > main pom. I would like to use the same profile to hook the pmd
> >also
> >>> defined
> >>> > by 'openejb-core/pom.xml'. The goal is to use the
> >'check-formatting'
> >>> step
> >>> > [Example:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >
> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/112/steps/check-formatting
> >>> > ]
> >>> > for both checkstyle and pmd. It would make the build to break
> >faster in
> >>> > case we have styling issues.
> >>> >
> >>> > >>BTW would be great to remove src/main/config/checkstyle.xml and
> >use
> >>> > new checktyle plugin inline feature (checkstyle.xml in
> ><configuration>)
> >>> >
> >>> > I prefer to have a separated configuration file for that. Anyway,
> >the
> >>> > current pmd checks already have a few custom configuration files.
> >>> > Checkstyle would follow the same path.
> >>> >
> >>> > []s,
> >>> > Thiago.
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> > <[email protected]>wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Hi Thiago,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > in container/openejb-core/pom.xml?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > BTW would be great to remove src/main/config/checkstyle.xml and
> >use
> >>> new
> >>> > > checktyle plugin inline feature (checkstyle.xml in
> ><configuration>)
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>> > > Twitter: @rmannibucau
> >>> > > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> >>> > > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> >>> > > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > 2014-05-21 17:24 GMT+02:00 Thiago Veronezi
> ><[email protected]>:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Hi guys,
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Where is the checkstyle trigger defined in our build? I would
> >like
> >>> to
> >>> > > move
> >>> > > > the existing openejb-core checkstyle and pmd checks to the
> >root
> >>> > module. I
> >>> > > > know how to do it for checkstyle, but I didnt find where we
> >call
> >>> 'mvn3
> >>> > -U
> >>> > > > checkstyle:checkstyle -Pstyle', so I can do the same thing for
> >pmd.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > []s,
> >>> > > > Thiago.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to