Well 2 and last sentence were not consistent to me

If it can help i do it with everybody ;)
Le 19 août 2014 10:17, "Andy Gumbrecht" <[email protected]> a écrit :

> Sometimes it feels like you don't even read past the first line of what I
> write and just want to flame me for whatever reason?
>
> On 19/08/2014 10:11, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>> 1 should not be done (trunk -> branch is the way imho otherwise i'm sure
>> well miss features on trunk which is worse than the.opposite)
>>
>> About "merge what we can" we need a thread on it i guess.
>>
>> Perso i dont do it for new features even when doable cause 1) time, 2)
>> trunk already diverged from branch on some important aspects (scanning,
>> ill
>> try to merge this one soon cause it fixes 2 important bugs), 3) 1.x is in
>> maintenance so for me it means fixes but no more features -> to discuss
>> also in the same thread.
>> Le 19 août 2014 08:59, "Andy Gumbrecht" <[email protected]> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>  Hi Devs,
>>>
>>> As we are not dropping the ball on TomEE 1.7.x just yet it is still
>>> important to maintain the code base here:
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomee/tomee/branches/tomee-1.7.x
>>>
>>> The buildbot is configured for this repository here:
>>>
>>> http://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-1.7.x-ubuntu
>>>
>>> To that end, please don't forget to either:
>>>
>>> 1. Fix and test the code in the 1.7.x branch first and merge to trunk
>>>
>>> 2. Fix the code in trunk and back-port what is applicable to 1.7.x
>>>
>>> This also means creating JIRA's for 1.7.1 - The 1.7.x branch will not be
>>> getting any new features, so this only applies to issues.
>>>
>>> Thanks everyone,
>>>
>>> Andy.
>>>
>>> --
>>>    Andy Gumbrecht
>>>
>>>    http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>    [email protected]
>>>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>
>>>    TomEE treibt Tomitribe! | http://tomee.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> --
>   Andy Gumbrecht
>
>   http://www.tomitribe.com
>   [email protected]
>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>
>   TomEE treibt Tomitribe! | http://tomee.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to