I'm fine with either way to work. But it's true that for 1.x and 2.x maintenance, it's way either with GIT.
JLouis -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 for git. > Local branches make everything much easier. > > []s, > Thiago > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:58 AM, David Blevins <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all the > > merging we'll need to do between 1.7 and 2.0, this might be the right > time > > to switch to git. > > > > Pull requests from Github would get a lot easier as well. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > > -- > > David Blevins > > http://twitter.com/dblevins > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > >
