+0 (really neutral don't care)
Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-08-27 18:10 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro <[email protected]>: > I'm fine with either way to work. > But it's true that for 1.x and 2.x maintenance, it's way either with GIT. > > JLouis > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 for git. >> Local branches make everything much easier. >> >> []s, >> Thiago >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:58 AM, David Blevins <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all the >> > merging we'll need to do between 1.7 and 2.0, this might be the right >> time >> > to switch to git. >> > >> > Pull requests from Github would get a lot easier as well. >> > >> > Thoughts? >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > David Blevins >> > http://twitter.com/dblevins >> > http://www.tomitribe.com >> > >> > >>
