Unfortunately, not enough GIT background to help much in this discussion.
I can only say that I used (copied) the Deltaspike workflow in the past and
it was enough for our needs.

Jean-Louis

--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com

On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 10:11 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:

> Folks, that gitflow is totally nuts imo!
>
> First, this is a project with only senior devs, this would be the first
> ASF project which has Review-Then-Commmit (RTC) on trunk/master. RTC is
> usually only done for maintenance- and/or relaese-branches. Everything else
> is CTR. The develop branch is just a useless buffer without a build/release
> manager who does the review and merging. It will be a hell to maintain.
>
>
>
> Second: Creating tons of temporary branches is NOT a good idea for an
> upstream cannonical repo.
>
>
> > git push -u origin TOMEE-007
>
> Such things are perfectly fine on private repos or for sending pull
> requests, but not on the central ASF repo. Why? Simple because you cannot
> delete those branches later (ASF repos are usually configured to prevent
> history rewrite). And also opposite to SVN you cannot get back a branch
> someone deleted or a history someone rewrote. Once a GIT repo is trashed,
> then you can only do a restore of the whole repo from some file backup.
>
>
> > git pull origin develop
>
> Third: You should explain the difference between pull and fetch resp git
> pull --rebase
>
> Otherwise our history will either be broken (history rewrite) or full with
> useless merge-commits.
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> PS: I am using GIT since 2006 and I e.g. wrote the maven-scm-providers-git
> stuff back then. GIT IS cool, but also a strong weapon to shoot yourself in
> the knee if you don't be careful.
>
>
>
> > On Friday, 17 October 2014, 17:35, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> > > yes, so master is just a single branch showing only tags, what's the
> > need behind?
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >
> >
> > 2014-10-17 17:30 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <[email protected]>:
> >>  Release branches act as a buffer between feature development (develop)
> and
> >>  public releases (master).
> >>  Whenever you merge something into master, you should tag the commit for
> >>  reference
> >>
> >>  git tag -a tomee-1.7.2 -m "TomEE 1.7.2 Release" master
> >>  git push --tags
> >>
> >>
> >>  On 17/10/2014 16:46, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  sorry I'm surely slow today but it if can avoid me 1h ;): so
> > what's
> >>>  different with tags? ie when do you go to master without having a
> >>>  release?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>  @rmannibucau
> >>>  http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>  http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> >>>  https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  2014-10-17 16:41 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht
> > <[email protected]>:
> >>>>
> >>>>  Not quite, the /release /branch takes place 'whenever' -
> > This means it
> >>>>  would
> >>>>  be 'nice' to create it from a stable /develop/, but is NOT
> > required (this
> >>>>  is
> >>>>  the big +1 for me).
> >>>>
> >>>>  The /release /branch is where the release is polished and prepared
> > and
> >>>>  all
> >>>>  the tests must 'eventually' pass - work can continue in
> > /develop/
> >>>>  (another
> >>>>  big +1) - everyone can help make the /release /stable.
> >>>>
> >>>>  When the /release /branch is ready then it is merged to /master
> > /*and
> >>>>  */develop /(if there were changes in the /release /then they also
> > need to
> >>>>  get merged back to /develop/)
> >>>>
> >>>>  The /master /branch only ever contains stable production ready
> > code.
> >>>>
> >>>>  Andy.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>  On 17/10/2014 15:54, Daniel Kasmeroglu wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Regarding the creation of a release branch I assume that
> > creating the
> >>>>>  branch from 'develop' implies that all available tests
> > and quality
> >>>>>  criteries must be matched before the actual branching takes
> > place.
> >>>>>  Am I right on this ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Best regards
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  Daniel Kasmeroglu
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>  --
> >>>>     Andy Gumbrecht
> >>>>     https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >>>>     http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>  --
> >>    Andy Gumbrecht
> >>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >>   http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to