So be it *pusheldiekatz*

I now merged ‚develop‘ into ‚master‘

I’m also working on some windows related issues which I have at a customer.
Mainly bat scripting and test fixes…

LieGrue,
strub



> Am 30.01.2015 um 17:37 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]>:
> 
> Let’s GID!  :)
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Alan
> 
>> On Jan 28, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I personally would suggest we disable history rewrite for our whole ASF 
>> repo. This is a single config line in the repo. 
>> 
>> History rewrite has a huge potential to crack the repo beyond repair anyway.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Wednesday, 28 January 2015, 20:12, Romain Manni-Bucau 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Nothing forbids it so it is responsability of everyone.
>>> 
>>> Le 28 janv. 2015 19:59, "Alan D. Cabrera" <[email protected]> 
>>> a écrit :
>>> 
>>>> Ahh, ok, your warnings did seem overly broad to me.
>>>> 
>>>> How is that enforced on ASF infrastructure?  Is it by an “honor system”
>>>> that we assume no history rewrites are taking place?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Jan 28, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Deleting those is fine. But we must make sure that no essential commit
>>>> gets lost. And this is only doable by totally forbidding history rewrite on
>>>> the repo.
>>>>> 
>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wednesday, 28 January 2015, 18:27, Alan Cabrera <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Deleting committed changes is definitely bad. Deleting 
>>> branches that
>>>> ultimately
>>>>>> participate in the release is also bad.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> However, deleting tags for "failed" releases is fine as 
>>> is deleting a
>>>>>> branch that never transitively participated in a release should be 
>>> fine
>>>> as well.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Do I misunderstand something?  Is there some infrastructure 
>>> limitation?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Jan 28, 2015, at 6:07 AM, Mark Struberg 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I've found another thing which is ugly
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> release-tomee-1.7.2 and
>>>>>>> tomee-1.7.2 branches which are actually just leftovers it 
>>> seems?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please be aware that we MUST NOT DELETE anything at ASF repos! 
>>> We must
>>>> not
>>>>>> do history rewrite!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So think REALLY hard before creating branches which are just 
>>> utter
>>>> garbage.
>>>>>> In git you just cannot get rid of them that easily. They get 
>>> mirrored
>>>> downstream
>>>>>> automatically and we have no whatever control about them anymore!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please read how we handle GIT over at DeltaSpike.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We e.g. release with localCheckout=true and pushChanges=false.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Just ping me if I need to go into details.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
> 

Reply via email to