Hi guys, So "develop" is dead, right? Can we update http://tomee.apache.org/dev/source-code.html ?
[]s, Thiago. On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > So be it *pusheldiekatz* > > I now merged ‚develop‘ into ‚master‘ > > I’m also working on some windows related issues which I have at a customer. > Mainly bat scripting and test fixes… > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > Am 30.01.2015 um 17:37 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]>: > > > > Let’s GID! :) > > > > > > Regards, > > Alan > > > >> On Jan 28, 2015, at 11:39 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> I personally would suggest we disable history rewrite for our whole ASF > repo. This is a single config line in the repo. > >> > >> History rewrite has a huge potential to crack the repo beyond repair > anyway. > >> > >> > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> On Wednesday, 28 January 2015, 20:12, Romain Manni-Bucau < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Nothing forbids it so it is responsability of everyone. > >>> > >>> Le 28 janv. 2015 19:59, "Alan D. Cabrera" <[email protected]> > >>> a écrit : > >>> > >>>> Ahh, ok, your warnings did seem overly broad to me. > >>>> > >>>> How is that enforced on ASF infrastructure? Is it by an “honor > system” > >>>> that we assume no history rewrites are taking place? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Alan > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> On Jan 28, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Deleting those is fine. But we must make sure that no essential > commit > >>>> gets lost. And this is only doable by totally forbidding history > rewrite on > >>>> the repo. > >>>>> > >>>>> LieGrue, > >>>>> strub > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Wednesday, 28 January 2015, 18:27, Alan Cabrera < > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> Deleting committed changes is definitely bad. Deleting > >>> branches that > >>>> ultimately > >>>>>> participate in the release is also bad. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> However, deleting tags for "failed" releases is fine as > >>> is deleting a > >>>>>> branch that never transitively participated in a release should be > >>> fine > >>>> as well. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Do I misunderstand something? Is there some infrastructure > >>> limitation? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Jan 28, 2015, at 6:07 AM, Mark Struberg > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi folks! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I've found another thing which is ugly > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> release-tomee-1.7.2 and > >>>>>>> tomee-1.7.2 branches which are actually just leftovers it > >>> seems? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Please be aware that we MUST NOT DELETE anything at ASF repos! > >>> We must > >>>> not > >>>>>> do history rewrite! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> So think REALLY hard before creating branches which are just > >>> utter > >>>> garbage. > >>>>>> In git you just cannot get rid of them that easily. They get > >>> mirrored > >>>> downstream > >>>>>> automatically and we have no whatever control about them anymore! > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Please read how we handle GIT over at DeltaSpike. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> We e.g. release with localCheckout=true and pushChanges=false. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Just ping me if I need to go into details. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> LieGrue, > >>>>>>> strub > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > > > >
