xbean-asm-shaded is dual licensed with an Apache 2.0 license, but I also find
the following references to the ASM license:
\assembly\openejb-standalone\src\main\resources\LICENSE
\examples\LICENSE
\itests\openejb-itests-app\src\main\application\META-INF\LICENSE
\tomee\apache-tomee\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
\tomee\tomee-plume-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
\tomee\tomee-plus-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
\tomee\tomee-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
\utils\openejb-provisionning\src\main\legal\LICENSE
Joda time is Apache 2.0: http://joda-time.sourceforge.net/license.html - We are
not shipping a 'Derivative Work' so the NOTICE mention is not 'required', just
courteous. We'll add it to the next release.
Not sure what you mean with java-support OWasp?
Andy.
On 01/12/2015 11:52, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
I think it probably can.
That said, I have the following queries with the LICENCE/NOTICE files:
1. ASM notice from xbean-asm-shaded looks like its missing
2. Joda time notice looks like its missing
3. Notice for java-support jar (reference to OWasp) looks like its missing.
I'd be grateful if someone else could double check.
Thanks
Jon
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
[email protected]> wrote:
Can we close the vote now?
It's been opened for more than 10 days now.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
[email protected]> wrote:
Here is my +1 Andy
Thank you very much for your patience and hard work
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
[email protected]> wrote:
Ditto. (I'll review tonight, not I have no patience) :-)
Jon
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Andy Gumbrecht <
[email protected]
wrote:
I have none, can you not tell I am about to explode? :-D
On 23 November 2015 at 17:15, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
[email protected]>
wrote:
Same here. Built it and ran a couple of time, but still need the
legal
stuff.
Thanks Andy for you patience.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
wrote:
Looks good so far.
Trying to review it in depth this evening.
LieGrue,
strub
Am 23.11.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
[email protected]
:
+1, thanks Andy for the hard work!
side note: we should say we have some deps the main project
doesn't
build
in tags when it is the case (javaee-api, jcs here), thought to
the
vote
mail but then thought maybe in main README it would be better.
Just a
side
note before forgetting :).
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>
2015-11-20 17:06 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <[email protected]>:
Do you need any kind of help on this in terms of downloading
something
in
clean environment and inspect something?
El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
[email protected]>)
va escriure:
Hmm
Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise
binaries
would
be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <
[email protected]>
a
écrit :
Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it
and
take
it
from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
--
Andy Gumbrecht
https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
http://www.tomitribe.com
--
Andy Gumbrecht
https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
http://www.tomitribe.com
--
Jonathan Gallimore
http://twitter.com/jongallimore
http://www.tomitribe.com
--
Andy Gumbrecht
https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
