Hi Jon, nothing more than the proposal "To make it clear this is a VOTE by LAZY consensus to use 7.0.0 as next tomee release version." = starting a [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.0 following this vote.
"What is GA" - guess you mean more Final since GA just means available and milestone are king of GA by definition? I think it is what the *project* judges stable enough. I think it is very important for us to break this insane dependency to Oracle we don't control and having delayed us of at least 2 years. This means you can see the vote as "is master stable enough to be released as Final and no more as milestone which supposes implicitly no quality guarantee?". Legally we can do Final (0.0) when we want certified or not (TomEE is an autonomous ASF project). If we get TCK and certified we can do a 8.0.0 if you want to "mark" it but that's another topic we'll cover if relevant at that point. Does it clarify the intent? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> 2016-04-25 14:28 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <jgallim...@tomitribe.com>: > I'm not sure what I'm voting for and how this relates to the other thread > "Next release 7.1". > > Is it both of the following? > > * No change in version numbering (i.e. continue with 7.0.0.M1, M2, M3, M4 > etc until we get to a 7.0.0 GA) > * Include Tomcat 8.5 and later in the 7.0.x series with no separate fork > for Tomcat 8.5 support > > If it is, I'd expect the next release to be a 7.0.0.M4, with Tomcat 8.5 > included. > > The next question is - what is GA? As we aligned with Java EE version > numbering, I'd expect a 7.0.0.GA to be a JEE 7 certified released, at > least > for webprofile, and I think it needs to be very clearly communicated if > that is not the case. Are their any legal implications of releasing a TomEE > 7.0.0 GA that is not certified? > > Jon > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > seems we'll reach a consensus soon on the fact we have to use 7.0 for > next > > release so trying to make the global topic moving forward ie the next > tomee > > release version. > > > > Using milestones doesn't reflect code state and has the following > > disadvantages: > > > > - we have no clue yet we'll sort soon oracle discussions > > - it prevents tooling and cloud integration (this thread is not about > > discussing it is for good reasons or bad) > > - milestones seems to impact some user/manager minds where it can be more > > stable than some previous final releases, then also impacts us as a > > community since we don't reach the usage we should > > - we are stable since months, if we stop we can still change the version > > later if desired but today we are > > > > To make it clear this is a VOTE by LAZY consensus to use 7.0.0 as next > > tomee release version. > > > > [+1] yes let's do it > > [ 0] what are you speaking about? meh don't care > > [-1] no cause ${reason} is a blocker > > > > Vote is open for 72 hours. > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Github > > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > > > > > -- > Jonathan Gallimore > http://twitter.com/jongallimore > http://www.tomitribe.com >
