I did a run over dependencies and couldn't find anything.
So here is my +1 LieGrue, strub > On Monday, 23 May 2016, 23:48, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Le 23 mai 2016 23:42, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" > <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> a > écrit : >> >> So what is the status regarding the LICENSE and NOTICE? > > Nothing patrticular. > >> Don't want to spend time checking the release if there is still pending >> tasks to do. >> >> We have agreed that the documentation needs to be clear regarding the >> status of this release (not Java EE 6 certified nor Java EE 7 certified). >> Could we have that download page to be split into something like 2 parts: >> 1.x and 7.x >> With the information on the policy at the top. >> Each section explicitly mentioning which Java EE version are we >> implementing, if it is certified and what is complete or not in the TomEE >> 7.x >> The current version with all the links at the top looks now a bit messy > and >> the policy on a separate page makes it difficult to find out in my > opinion. >> > > Was planning to just keep 1 version by minor for maintained releases + link > the version policy. All other versions would go in archives. That is my > second task once vote passed. > > This is however out of vote scope, version policy page work has been done > and nobody complained in 5 days so guess it is fine to go then we can > enhance it if needed but i dont see it anymore as a blocker - compared to > the lack of votes ;). > >> That seemed to be the agreement of the last vote. >> >> That said, I spent some time grabbing the sources and trying to compile >> without success. >> XAPoolTest keeps failing locally when I run it with openejb-core >> > > The code of this vote was green on buildbot when tagged so can likely be > something else or envrt dpd. Ping me if you need help. > >> Alone it works. I'll check that out tomorrow if I can get the test > fixed >> and more reliable (if possible). >> > > Thanks for taking time to have a look. > > >> >> -- >> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament > <johndam...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM David Blevins > <david.blev...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > > On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > 2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins > <david.blev...@gmail.com>: >> > > > >> > > >> Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance > of an > official >> > > vote >> > > >> for major releases: >> > > >> >> > > >> [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034) >> > > >> http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw >> > > >> >> > > >> [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092) >> > > >> http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron >> > > >> >> > > >> 1.0.0 preview binaries >> > > >> http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w >> > > >> >> > > >> [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132) >> > > >> http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65 >> > > >> >> > > >> Binary comparison of this release to previous to help > with LICENSE > and >> > > >> NOTICE file updates: >> > > >> >> > > >> 1.0.0 - 1.5.0 > http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/ppvkyeznaryjluve >> > > >> >> > > >> 1.5.0 - 1.5.1 > http://markmail.org/message/pmwkycgdrz2php6n >> > > >> >> > > >> 1.5.1 - 1.6.0 > http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/xwy56krafcxm3kgs >> > > >> >> > > >> And RAT scan: >> > > >> >> > > >> - http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d < >> > > >> http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d> >> > > >> >> > > >> Also preemptive note, despite that “72 hours” has been > in all the > vote >> > > >> threads, we’ve always left votes open longer to ensure > everyone has >> > > time to >> > > >> give feedback. So I’m hoping the response is not “you > have 72 > hours >> > to >> > > do >> > > >> this” as they’ve historically been done by the release > manager. >> > > >> >> > > >> Can we consider this a preview release and execute the > diffs, rat >> > > reports >> > > >> and ensure our LICENSE and NOTICE files are up to date? > Or at the >> > very >> > > >> least pause this vote till that stuff is done. >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > 6 months ago I would have said yes but since v7 is > 1 > year old > think >> > we >> > > > got all the time to do all the fancy stuff we want and if > not done > in 1 >> > > > year will likely not be done now so *personally* I don't > accept any >> > > excuse >> > > > anymore to delay a release. >> > > >> > > Just an FYI that incorrect LICENSE and NOTICE files is a > showstopper > for >> > > any release and not subject to majority vote. >> > > >> > >> > For a TLP, it definitely is. >> > >> > >> > > >> > > I’ve had to reroll countless releases because they were wrong, > hence >> > > putting effort into those practices. >> > > >> > > >> > > -David >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > >> -- >> > > >> David Blevins >> > > >> http://twitter.com/dblevins >> > > >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> > > >> >> > > >>> On May 19, 2016, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins < > david.blev...@gmail.com >> > > >> > > >> wrote: >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Can you put up a proposed page for the download and > I can give >> > feedback >> > > >> on how it should be updated. Let’s start another > thread. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> I’m obviously very time constrained, but happy to > give you time > and >> > > work >> > > >> openly on it. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> -- >> > > >>> David Blevins >> > > >>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > <http://twitter.com/dblevins> >> > > >>> http://www.tomitribe.com >> > > >>> >> > > >>>> On May 19, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > < >> > > rmannibu...@gmail.com >> > > >> <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> @David: > http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html < >> > > >> http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html>, > just added a >> > > >>>> link on the download page >> > > http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think >> > > >> <http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think> the >> > > >>>> information is there but don't hesitate to > tune/customize/update > the >> > > >>>> website until you are fully happy with it. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >> > > >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau > < >> > > >> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> | Blog >> > > >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com < >> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ >> > > >> >> > > >> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau < >> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau>> >> > > >> | >> > > >>>> LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau < >> > > >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>> | > Tomitriber >> > > >>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com > <http://www.tomitribe.com/>> | JavaEE >> > > Factory >> > > >>>> > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com < >> > > >> https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com/>> >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> 2016-05-19 21:03 GMT+02:00 David Blevins > <david.blev...@gmail.com >> > > >> <mailto:david.blev...@gmail.com>>: >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>>> Also the download page would need to be > updated. It currently > says >> > > >> “Java >> > > >>>>> EE 6 compliant” and we would need to remove > that and replace it >> > with >> > > >> “NOT >> > > >>>>> Java EE 7 compliant”. That text should be a > link to an > explanation >> > > of >> > > >> why >> > > >>>>> and an explanation of the version number. >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> -- >> > > >>>>> David Blevins >> > > >>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > <http://twitter.com/dblevins> >> > > >>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>>> On May 19, 2016, at 11:59 AM, David > Blevins < >> > > david.blev...@gmail.com> >> > > >>>>> wrote: >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> Where is the documentation page again? >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>> -- >> > > >>>>>> David Blevins >> > > >>>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > <http://twitter.com/dblevins> >> > > >>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> On May 18, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Romain > Manni-Bucau < >> > > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com >> > > >>>>> <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> > wrote: >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> Hi >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> As mentionned and after the vote > about the version here is the >> > > 7.0.0 >> > > >>>>> vote. >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> Here are the release notes: >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051 >> > > >>>>> < >> > > >>>>> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051 >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> Keys file is still the same: >> > > https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> As discussed pushed the tag on > github: >> > > >>>>>>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0 >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> New staging repository is >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >> >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1097 >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> Dev dist is > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0 >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> Vote will be open for 72h or until > we get 3 +1 bindings. > Binding >> > or >> > > >> not >> > > >>>>>>> everyone is very welcomed to test > and vote. >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> Please vote: >> > > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks! >> > > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 dont' know just wanted to > say hello but no idea what we >> > are >> > > >>>>> talking >> > > >>>>>>> about >> > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 no cause ${blocker <- > X} >> > > >>>>>>> >> > > >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >> > > >>>>>>> @rmannibucau > <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> > > >>>>>>> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >> > > >>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >> > > >>>>>>> LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | > Tomitriber >> > > >>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | > JavaEE Factory >> > > >>>>>>> > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >> > > >>>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>>>> >> > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > >
