Thanks Romain, I'll take a look tonight. Jon
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > for the one using tentacle to check notice/license files: i uploaded it > there http://home.apache.org/~rmannibucau/orgapachetomee-1097/ (skipped > binaries/exploded folders cause my network connection doesn't allow that > ATM) > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2016-05-24 12:32 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > @Jon: no cause we didn't change any dependencies outside asf > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github > > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > > > 2016-05-24 11:57 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>: > > > >> I did a run over dependencies and couldn't find anything. > >> > >> > >> So here is my > >> > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > On Monday, 23 May 2016, 23:48, Romain Manni-Bucau < > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > Le 23 mai 2016 23:42, "Jean-Louis Monteiro" > >> > <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> a > >> > écrit : > >> >> > >> >> So what is the status regarding the LICENSE and NOTICE? > >> > > >> > Nothing patrticular. > >> > > >> >> Don't want to spend time checking the release if there is still > >> pending > >> >> tasks to do. > >> >> > >> >> We have agreed that the documentation needs to be clear regarding > the > >> >> status of this release (not Java EE 6 certified nor Java EE 7 > >> certified). > >> >> Could we have that download page to be split into something like 2 > >> parts: > >> >> 1.x and 7.x > >> >> With the information on the policy at the top. > >> >> Each section explicitly mentioning which Java EE version are we > >> >> implementing, if it is certified and what is complete or not in the > >> TomEE > >> >> 7.x > >> >> The current version with all the links at the top looks now a bit > >> messy > >> > and > >> >> the policy on a separate page makes it difficult to find out in my > >> > opinion. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Was planning to just keep 1 version by minor for maintained releases + > >> link > >> > the version policy. All other versions would go in archives. That is > my > >> > second task once vote passed. > >> > > >> > This is however out of vote scope, version policy page work has been > >> done > >> > and nobody complained in 5 days so guess it is fine to go then we can > >> > enhance it if needed but i dont see it anymore as a blocker - compared > >> to > >> > the lack of votes ;). > >> > > >> >> That seemed to be the agreement of the last vote. > >> >> > >> >> That said, I spent some time grabbing the sources and trying to > >> compile > >> >> without success. > >> >> XAPoolTest keeps failing locally when I run it with openejb-core > >> >> > >> > > >> > The code of this vote was green on buildbot when tagged so can likely > be > >> > something else or envrt dpd. Ping me if you need help. > >> > > >> >> Alone it works. I'll check that out tomorrow if I can get the test > >> > fixed > >> >> and more reliable (if possible). > >> >> > >> > > >> > Thanks for taking time to have a look. > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Jean-Louis Monteiro > >> >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >> >> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> >> > >> >> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 6:16 PM, John D. Ament > >> > <johndam...@apache.org> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 12:40 PM David Blevins > >> > <david.blev...@gmail.com> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > On May 19, 2016, at 11:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau < > >> >> > rmannibu...@gmail.com> > >> >> > > wrote: > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > 2016-05-20 1:23 GMT+02:00 David Blevins > >> > <david.blev...@gmail.com>: > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> Also, we’ve historically done a preview run in advance > >> > of an > >> > official > >> >> > > vote > >> >> > > >> for major releases: > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> [PREVIEW] OpenEJB 4.7.0/TomEE 1.7.0 (staging-1034) > >> >> > > >> http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/jjiheacmtd4tb6qw > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> [preview] OpenEJB 4.6.0/TomEE 1.6.0 (staging-092) > >> >> > > >> http://markmail.org/message/u6ripoz3lsxvcron > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> 1.0.0 preview binaries > >> >> > > >> http://markmail.org/message/f6ix44zeqlcaet3w > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> [preview] OpenEJB 4.5.1/TomEE 1.5.1 (staging-132) > >> >> > > >> http://markmail.org/message/l3rvltbc3az7xu65 > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> Binary comparison of this release to previous to help > >> > with LICENSE > >> > and > >> >> > > >> NOTICE file updates: > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> 1.0.0 - 1.5.0 > >> > http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/ppvkyeznaryjluve > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> 1.5.0 - 1.5.1 > >> > http://markmail.org/message/pmwkycgdrz2php6n > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> 1.5.1 - 1.6.0 > >> > http://openejb.markmail.org/thread/xwy56krafcxm3kgs > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> And RAT scan: > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> - http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d < > >> >> > > >> http://markmail.org/message/fmj5kveiw6kwmq6d> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> Also preemptive note, despite that “72 hours” has been > >> > in all the > >> > vote > >> >> > > >> threads, we’ve always left votes open longer to ensure > >> > everyone has > >> >> > > time to > >> >> > > >> give feedback. So I’m hoping the response is not “you > >> > have 72 > >> > hours > >> >> > to > >> >> > > do > >> >> > > >> this” as they’ve historically been done by the release > >> > manager. > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> Can we consider this a preview release and execute the > >> > diffs, rat > >> >> > > reports > >> >> > > >> and ensure our LICENSE and NOTICE files are up to date? > >> > Or at the > >> >> > very > >> >> > > >> least pause this vote till that stuff is done. > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > > 6 months ago I would have said yes but since v7 is > 1 > >> > year old > >> > think > >> >> > we > >> >> > > > got all the time to do all the fancy stuff we want and if > >> > not done > >> > in 1 > >> >> > > > year will likely not be done now so *personally* I don't > >> > accept any > >> >> > > excuse > >> >> > > > anymore to delay a release. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Just an FYI that incorrect LICENSE and NOTICE files is a > >> > showstopper > >> > for > >> >> > > any release and not subject to majority vote. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > For a TLP, it definitely is. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > I’ve had to reroll countless releases because they were wrong, > >> > hence > >> >> > > putting effort into those practices. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > -David > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> -- > >> >> > > >> David Blevins > >> >> > > >> http://twitter.com/dblevins > >> >> > > >> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >>> On May 19, 2016, at 12:45 PM, David Blevins < > >> > david.blev...@gmail.com > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> wrote: > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > > >>> Can you put up a proposed page for the download and > >> > I can give > >> >> > feedback > >> >> > > >> on how it should be updated. Let’s start another > >> > thread. > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > > >>> I’m obviously very time constrained, but happy to > >> > give you time > >> > and > >> >> > > work > >> >> > > >> openly on it. > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > > >>> -- > >> >> > > >>> David Blevins > >> >> > > >>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > >> > <http://twitter.com/dblevins> > >> >> > > >>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > > >>>> On May 19, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > >> > < > >> >> > > rmannibu...@gmail.com > >> >> > > >> <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> wrote: > >> >> > > >>>> > >> >> > > >>>> @David: > >> > http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html < > >> >> > > >> http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-version-policies.html>, > >> > just added a > >> >> > > >>>> link on the download page > >> >> > > http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think > >> >> > > >> <http://tomee.apache.org/downloads.html.Think> the > >> >> > > >>>> information is there but don't hesitate to > >> > tune/customize/update > >> > the > >> >> > > >>>> website until you are fully happy with it. > >> >> > > >>>> > >> >> > > >>>> > >> >> > > >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> >> > > >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau > >> > < > >> >> > > >> https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>> | Blog > >> >> > > >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com < > >> >> > http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau < > >> >> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau>> > >> >> > > >> | > >> >> > > >>>> LinkedIn > >> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau < > >> >> > > >> https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>> | > >> > Tomitriber > >> >> > > >>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > <http://www.tomitribe.com/>> | JavaEE > >> >> > > Factory > >> >> > > >>>> > >> > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com < > >> >> > > >> https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com/>> > >> >> > > >>>> > >> >> > > >>>> 2016-05-19 21:03 GMT+02:00 David Blevins > >> > <david.blev...@gmail.com > >> >> > > >> <mailto:david.blev...@gmail.com>>: > >> >> > > >>>> > >> >> > > >>>>> Also the download page would need to be > >> > updated. It currently > >> > says > >> >> > > >> “Java > >> >> > > >>>>> EE 6 compliant” and we would need to remove > >> > that and replace it > >> >> > with > >> >> > > >> “NOT > >> >> > > >>>>> Java EE 7 compliant”. That text should be a > >> > link to an > >> > explanation > >> >> > > of > >> >> > > >> why > >> >> > > >>>>> and an explanation of the version number. > >> >> > > >>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>> -- > >> >> > > >>>>> David Blevins > >> >> > > >>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > >> > <http://twitter.com/dblevins> > >> >> > > >>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> >> > > >>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> On May 19, 2016, at 11:59 AM, David > >> > Blevins < > >> >> > > david.blev...@gmail.com> > >> >> > > >>>>> wrote: > >> >> > > >>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> Where is the documentation page again? > >> >> > > >>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>> -- > >> >> > > >>>>>> David Blevins > >> >> > > >>>>>> http://twitter.com/dblevins > >> > <http://twitter.com/dblevins> > >> >> > > >>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com > >> >> > > >>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> On May 18, 2016, at 12:39 AM, Romain > >> > Manni-Bucau < > >> >> > > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com > >> >> > > >>>>> <mailto:rmannibu...@gmail.com>> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> Hi > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> As mentionned and after the vote > >> > about the version here is the > >> >> > > 7.0.0 > >> >> > > >>>>> vote. > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> Here are the release notes: > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051 > >> >> > > >>>>> < > >> >> > > >>>>> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12335051 > >> >> > > >>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> Keys file is still the same: > >> >> > > https://www.apache.org/dist/tomee/KEYS > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> As discussed pushed the tag on > >> > github: > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > https://github.com/rmannibucau/tomee/tree/tomee-7.0.0 > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> New staging repository is > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1097 > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> Dev dist is > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/7.0.0 > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> Vote will be open for 72h or until > >> > we get 3 +1 bindings. > >> > Binding > >> >> > or > >> >> > > >> not > >> >> > > >>>>>>> everyone is very welcomed to test > >> > and vote. > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> Please vote: > >> >> > > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 yeah it rocks! > >> >> > > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 dont' know just wanted to > >> > say hello but no idea what we > >> >> > are > >> >> > > >>>>> talking > >> >> > > >>>>>>> about > >> >> > > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 no cause ${blocker <- > >> > X} > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> >> > > >>>>>>> @rmannibucau > >> > <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > >> >> > > >>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > >> >> > > >>>>>>> LinkedIn > >> > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | > >> > Tomitriber > >> >> > > >>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | > >> > JavaEE Factory > >> >> > > >>>>>>> > >> > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > >> >> > > >>>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>> > >> >> > > >>>>> > >> >> > > >>> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > -- Jonathan Gallimore http://twitter.com/jongallimore http://www.tomitribe.com
