Hi Matthew, if you checkout https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look to XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should be the way to go I think.
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>: > hi rmannibucau, > i tried to contact you by IRC about this. i am ready to continue after a > busy period. > what do you mean about moving up the svn tree? > > > On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> >> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree IIRC >> >> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead" >> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> >> a écrit : >> >>> just the ones from the poms? the target and .svn ones can be ignored? >>> >>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e 'xalan' >>> >>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45: >>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"; >>> >>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52: >>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/> >>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib xmlns:xalan=" >>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2 >>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"; >>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee >>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"; version="2.0"> >>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45: xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache >>> .org/xslt" >>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/> >>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan >>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib >>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2 >>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee"; >>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee >>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd"; version="2.0"> >>> >>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: >>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: - xalan >>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>> >>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18: >>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>> Binary file >>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz >>> matches >>> Binary file >>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip >>> matches >>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - >>> xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>> >>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: >>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1- >>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan >>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>> Binary file ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1- >>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches >>> Binary file >>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war >>> matches >>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: >>> - xalan xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1 >>> >>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462 >>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin >>> >>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93: >>> <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>> >>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94: >>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>> >>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95: >>> <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>> >>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96: >>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>> >>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21: >>> * [lifted from xalan] >>> >>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99: >>> <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>> >>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100: >>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>> >>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36: >>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar >>> >>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47: >>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar >>> >>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100: >>> <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>> >>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101: >>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be optional in >>> maven-bundle-plugin >>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>> >>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21: >>> * [lifted from xalan] >>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36: - xalan-2.7.1.jar >>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47: - xalan-2.7.1.jar >>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId> >>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId> >>> >>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>> >>>> Yes >>>> >>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead" >>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u >>>> k> >>>> a écrit : >>>> >>>> ok i cloned and built. but what am i supposed to do? remove all xalan >>>>> >>>>> refs? >>>>> >>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>> >>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date >>>>>> >>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>> >>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead < >>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk >>>>>> >>>>>> : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;) >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead" >>>>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u >>>>>>>> k> >>>>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> is there a cure for this? we previously tried to exclude other >>>>>>>> versions >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yep >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder >>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> fop >>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead" >>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u >>>>>>>>>> k> >>>>>>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault >>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager >>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager. >>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13 >>>>>>>>>>> 7) >>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext. >>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102) >>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext. >>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349) >>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext. >>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337) >>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T >>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor >>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397) >>>>>>>>>>> at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty >>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty >>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp. >>>>>>>>>>> Romain >>>>>>>>>>> said >>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions. i include apache fop >>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE >>>>>>>>>>> stack >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jon >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead < >>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development >>>>>>>>>>>> setup. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am >>>>>>>>>>>>> running >>>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far. I will just >>>>>>>>>>>>> keep >>>>>>>>>>>>> working >>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its >>>>>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots >>>>>>>>>>>>> won't >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I >>>>>>>>>>>>>> think >>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so >>>>>>>>>>>>>> if >>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're >>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one >>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I was able to run my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> | >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy...@gmx.de >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjae...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbre...@tomitribe.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1: Release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ... See below. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
