yes, that's the ones to fix  - make it compiling + validate perfs are still ok.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn


2017-11-21 11:25 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
> it is imported in these ones in main as well as loads in test
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:28:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ExprSupport.java:29:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:26:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:27:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/ForEachTag.java:28:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:24:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/IfTag.java:25:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:29:import
> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:30:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:31:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/JSTLVariableStack.java:32:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObjectFactory;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:27:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:28:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/SetTag.java:29:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:24:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPath;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/WhenTag.java:25:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:25:import
> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:26:import
> org.apache.xpath.XPathContext;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:27:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XBoolean;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:28:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNodeSet;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:29:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XNumber;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:30:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XObject;
> ./impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/tag/common/xml/XalanUtil.java:31:import
> org.apache.xpath.objects.XString;
>
>
> On 21/11/2017 11:17, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>> No, you see this stack cause the test cant be loaded but it is in
>> several classes of taglib project, XalanUtil and a few others.
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>
>>
>> 2017-11-21 11:14 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>
>>> so do i need to replace it with something else?  is that inside
>>> ReflectionUtils?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/11/2017 11:08, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That's the one, org.apache.xpath is provided by xalan (don't ask me
>>>> why xalan is not in the name ;))
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-11-21 10:57 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>
>>>>> mvn install outputs this:
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.SurefireReflectionException:
>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException; nested exception is
>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException: null
>>>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
>>>>>       at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>>>>>       at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
>>>>>       at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
>>>>>       at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498)
>>>>>       at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
>>>>>       at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
>>>>>       at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
>>>>>       at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:103)
>>>>>       at
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:74)
>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
>>>>> org/apache/xpath/VariableStack
>>>>>       at java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethods0(Native Method)
>>>>>       at java.lang.Class.privateGetDeclaredMethods(Class.java:2701)
>>>>>       at java.lang.Class.privateGetMethodRecursive(Class.java:3048)
>>>>>       at java.lang.Class.getMethod0(Class.java:3018)
>>>>>       at java.lang.Class.getMethod(Class.java:1784)
>>>>>       at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.tryGetMethod(ReflectionUtils.java:57)
>>>>>       at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isSuiteOnly(JUnit3TestChecker.java:64)
>>>>>       at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.isValidJUnit3Test(JUnit3TestChecker.java:59)
>>>>>       at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit3.JUnit3TestChecker.accept(JUnit3TestChecker.java:54)
>>>>>       at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.common.junit4.JUnit4TestChecker.accept(JUnit4TestChecker.java:51)
>>>>>       at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.DefaultDirectoryScanner.locateTestClasses(DefaultDirectoryScanner.java:84)
>>>>>       at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.scanClassPath(JUnit4Provider.java:186)
>>>>>       at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:93)
>>>>>       ... 9 more
>>>>> Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
>>>>> org.apache.xpath.VariableStack
>>>>>       at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
>>>>>       at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
>>>>>       at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:335)
>>>>>       at java.lang
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:53, Matthew Broadhead wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> the dependency is listed in each pom.xml in
>>>>>> - compat
>>>>>> - impl
>>>>>> - jstlel
>>>>>> - standard-test
>>>>>> it is listed as provided in all of them except standard-test.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> would i just remove all references and then do a mvn install to check
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> output?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 21/11/2017 10:38, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Matthew,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> if you checkout
>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/standard/trunk and
>>>>>>> drop xalan dependency you should be on track. You can have a look to
>>>>>>> XalanUtil class but the xalan dependency is mainly here for XPath
>>>>>>> usage IIRC. There are some replacements in the JRE so it should be
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> way to go I think.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>> @rmannibucau |  Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-11-21 10:27 GMT+01:00 Matthew Broadhead
>>>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> hi rmannibucau,
>>>>>>>> i tried to contact you by IRC about this.  i am ready to continue
>>>>>>>> after
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> busy period.
>>>>>>>> what do you mean about moving up the svn tree?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 09:06, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There are imports in .java but you need to move up in the svn tree
>>>>>>>>> IIRC
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Le 11 oct. 2017 07:59, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk>
>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> just the ones from the poms?   the target and .svn ones can be
>>>>>>>>>> ignored?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Mac-mini-2:apache-taglibs matthewbroadhead$ grep -rnw '.' -e
>>>>>>>>>> 'xalan'
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:45:
>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt";
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/.svn/pristine/36/3681b927c636bd3adf5237f40af67c9742b9f76b.svn-base:52:
>>>>>>>>>> xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/main/tld/taglibs-rdc.tld:7: <taglib
>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="
>>>>>>>>>> http://xml.apache.org/xslt"; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee";
>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd";
>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:45:
>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache
>>>>>>>>>> .org/xslt"
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/src/util/tld20.xsl:52: xalan:indent-amount="2"/>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:  -
>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/classes/META-INF/taglibs-rdc.tld:7:
>>>>>>>>>> <taglib
>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xalan="http://xml.apache.org/xslt";
>>>>>>>>>> xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2
>>>>>>>>>> 001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee";
>>>>>>>>>> xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee
>>>>>>>>>> http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/j2ee/web-jsptaglibrary_2_0.xsd";
>>>>>>>>>> version="2.0">
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>> - xalan  xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:  -
>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:18:
>>>>>>>>>> - xalan  xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-dist/target/taglibs-rdc-dist-1.1-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>> xalan  xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/maven-shared-archive-resources/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>> - xalan  xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14: - xalan
>>>>>>>>>> xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-
>>>>>>>>>> SNAPSHOT/WEB-INF/lib/xalan-2.5.1.jar matches
>>>>>>>>>> Binary file
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/taglibs-rdc-examples-1.1-SNAPSHOT.war
>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./rdc/taglibs-rdc-examples/target/test-classes/META-INF/DEPENDENCIES:14:
>>>>>>>>>> - xalan  xalan:xalan:jar:2.5.1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/08/08170df2a64cad924ad41ed7a83f549a7f932c8d.svn-base:47:50462
>>>>>>>>>> xalan import should not be optional in maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:93:
>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/09/09b81f3124eb457e32dbf676ed709ff97642b38c.svn-base:94:
>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:95:
>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/23/2358183c62068e9fbc86b63a7b01532e05591222.svn-base:96:
>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/2e/2eceffae8d205d2aa5e85d3a199c7332fe364173.svn-base:21:
>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:99:
>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/6b/6ba3a3954445faf3617d6988104909c332ddc2df.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:36:
>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/b5/b503d369c07bf237404c1f63f5aa1d3319242531.svn-base:47:
>>>>>>>>>> - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:100:
>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/.svn/pristine/f7/f7d9123b300f031d838d59a618167a9828ee79be.svn-base:101:
>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/CHANGES.txt:47:50462 xalan import should not be
>>>>>>>>>> optional
>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>> maven-bundle-plugin
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:99: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/compat/pom.xml:100: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:95: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/pom.xml:96: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/impl/src/main/java/org/apache/taglibs/standard/Version.java:21:
>>>>>>>>>> * [lifted from xalan]
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:100: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/jstlel/pom.xml:101: <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:36:   - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/README_bin.txt:47:   - xalan-2.7.1.jar
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:93: <groupId>xalan</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>> ./standard/standard-test/pom.xml:94:
>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>xalan</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 11/10/2017 00:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 21:21, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ok i cloned and built.  but what am i supposed to do? remove all
>>>>>>>>>>> xalan
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> refs?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 19:10, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is there a cure for this?  we previously tried to exclude
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> versions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> folder
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> k>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMMana
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gerDefault
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             at org.apache.xalan.transformer.T
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             at org.apache.xalan.templates.Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions.  i include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stack
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> development
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> setup.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far.  I will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> just
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keep
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> passes,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> its
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Snapshots
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> won't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I  was able to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <url>https://repository.apach
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>8.0.0</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                           <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <groupId>org.apache.tomee</gr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> oupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <version>7.0.4</version>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> use
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pom.xml
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RC
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voted
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regressions
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> andy...@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> until
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apps
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fkjae...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbre...@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> relate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             -1 Do not release because ... See
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ticket
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> applicable,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> consensus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to