Good to see the process work!
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 9:12 PM David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
> Officially closing the vote. Thanks for the patience everyone. This one
> needed some good discussion and a bit of extra time.
> Andy Gumbrecht
> Bruno Baptista
> David Blevins
> Gurkan Erdogdu
> Ivan Junckes Filho
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> Jonathan Gallimore
> Otávio Gonçalves de Santana
> Richard Monson-Haefel
> Rudy De Busscher
> Thiago Veronezi
> Matthew Broadhead
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Vote passes with eleven +1s, one 0, and one -1. Though this is a
> technical vote and a -1 would normally veto, after long discussion here and
> a short follow up with the board, all involved agree the -1 is not a true
> technical veto and not binding. Guidance from the board was to use a -0 on
> technical votes if the intent is not to veto. I think it would be good for
> us to be extra clear if a vote is a technical vote vs consensus.
> Though it took a while to talk this one out and the vote is not unanimous,
> it is good to see the discussion and high turnout. I think this reflects
> us using muscles we haven't used in a while and is an overall incredibly
> positive thing.
> Thanks to everyone who voted and participated in the community discussion!
> > On Mar 18, 2018, at 5:02 PM, David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
> > Jean-Louis has put a PR up for discussion for JWT Support in TomEE.
> > - https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/123
> > There are 35 commits spanning 27 days of work. It's been reviewed by
> Andy and Rudy. One a committer and one a contributor, which is great for
> > There's an open question as to where the code should live in its final
> state: TomEE or Geronimo. This conversation doesn't seem conclusive after
> 12 days. It's ok for us not to agree, but we should have more votes so
> there is a clear outcome and we are acting as a community to our best
> > Vote: Merge Pull Request 123?
> > +1 Yes, let's do it
> > +-0 Abstain
> > -1 No, don't put this code in TomEE
> > Out of respect for the conversation, this is not a vote of where the
> code will live in its final state. This is just a decision to merge or
> not. It would give the users something they can try, which can be updated
> by a future PR if the code does eventually move.
> > -David