+1

And please note that we still have a few projects which are not yet fully EE8. 
E.g in BVal we are still working on it. Down to just a few failing TCK tests, 
but still. 

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 19.04.2018 um 08:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:
> 
> A) without hesitation. After years of feedbacks, our state is that we have
> 2 kinds of users:
> 
> - I dont care about the certification
> - Certification is mandatory for me to look at what you do
> 
> Last category is clearly a subset of big companies and we lost them with EE
> 7 status so I think users just expect releases and moves.
> 
> It means release whatever you have and just clearly state what it is.
> 
> Side note: and we jakarta ee we can get back the second category but later.
> However at least we still make category a happy in the meantime.
> 
> Le 19 avr. 2018 05:10, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
>> On Apr 17, 2018, at 9:57 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>> 
>> What is blocking to release tomee 8? Nothing ;)
> 
> Moving this over as it's probably a good "top level" topic to discuss.
> This will probably come to do "do we care about certification anymore" and
> that will probably involve us asking users for their opinions.
> 
> Here's the status I'm aware of from my involvement in Jakarta EE / EE4J PMC.
> 
>  - TCKs are due to show up in the May, June timeframe.  Once they show up,
> we will be able to legally run them.  I.e. after 5 years our TCK access
> will finally be restored.
> 
>  - Jakarta EE 8 TCK will be an functionally identical copy of the Java EE
> 8 TCK.  This is intentional so being Jakarta EE 8 certified can be implied
> to be Java EE 8 certified.
> 
>  - As this one will be open source, we will all be able to work on it
> together, openly without special paperwork.  We will also be able to openly
> share the results and talk about how close or far we are and do we want to
> release then or wait.
> 
> So I see three options:
> 
> a) April - Release TomEE 8.x now with unknown compliance
> b) July - Run the Jakarta EE 8.x TCK, potentially release with known
> non-compliance and information on what isn't compliant
> c) September - Time-box closing as many issues as possible, fix what we
> can in 2 months and release with known non-compliance, but far less, and
> information on what isn't compliant
> d) ?? - Release TomEE 8.x when it is Jakarta EE 8 Web Profile compliant
> 
> I don't mention the 8.0 vs 8.1 distinction because I don't think it adds
> anything to the conversation.  Whenever we do our first release it would be
> called 8.0, it's really about when we want to do that.  I think we're all
> on the same page that if we did release 8.0 now, we'd increment the version
> in some way on milestones C or D.
> 
> I won't give my preference in this email as to not pollute the options.  If
> you see an option that isn't discussed, do the same and attempt to present
> it disconnected from your preference (i.e. use different emails).
> 
> We should probably discuss for a while, capture some options we like, then
> loop in users and try to get as much feedback as possible.  Maybe a google
> poll.
> 
> 
> -- 
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com

Reply via email to