I'm asking based on this from earlier - "For context: I know Jean-Louis is heading off to Brazil in May to do a TomEE talk that shows his JWT work. Ideally he's not showing a snapshot and people could leave with something they can try. He's doing that talk again in June."
JL - let us know what you need and how we can help you. Jon On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm, > > I don't get the rational of having a 7.x with that. Any reason? > Technically TomEE 8 is way more ready to release than TomEE 7.1 ;). > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- > ee-8-high-performance> > > 2018-04-19 12:00 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore < > [email protected]> > : > > > Right now we have JL's change in master as well as TomEE 8. I'm happy to > > try and find time to release both. However, I think we're inching very > > close with TomEE 7.0.5, so does anyone mind if I create the 7.1 branch, > and > > shift JL's JWT work there, and take it out of master (7.0.5)? > > > > Jon > > > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Mark Struberg > <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Of course having a TomEE-7.1 which bumps the requirement to java8 is > > cool. > > > And I fully support that. > > > But right now let's please focus on shipping TomEE-7.0.5 first. > > > Most probably 7.1 could be done almost in parallel. > > > But we do not have endless resources. At least I don't. > > > > > > LieGrue, > > > strub > > > > > > > Am 19.04.2018 um 05:25 schrieb David Blevins < > [email protected] > > >: > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Apr 18, 2018, at 4:08 AM, Mark Struberg > <[email protected] > > > > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> There was a discussion about this a few weeks ago where we agreed to > > > ship TomEE-7.0.5 and only then switch to a branch. > > > >> > > > >> That's the reason why we backported tons of stuff in Johnzon, OWB > and > > > OpenJPA. > > > >> Just waiting for feedback whether it now works fine or if there is > > > still something broken. > > > >> > > > >> So my suggestion is to apply this to the TomEE8 branch and wait with > > > the other PR until TomEE-7.0.5 is released. > > > > > > > > Kicked off a proper "Status of TomEE 8" thread so we can have a full > > > conversation on what to do with TomEE 8. > > > > > > > > If people were willing to put the effort into a TomEE 7.1 in addition > > to > > > whatever is decided in that thread, would you be ok with a TomEE 7.1 as > > > well? > > > > > > > > For context: I know Jean-Louis is heading off to Brazil in May to do > a > > > TomEE talk that shows his JWT work. Ideally he's not showing a > snapshot > > > and people could leave with something they can try. He's doing that > talk > > > again in June. > > > > > > > > My personal perspective is if the decision was made to release TomEE > 8 > > > now, I'd still see value in a 7.1 release with MicroProfile as then the > > > users would have the choice. Some may not want to do a Java EE 7 to > Java > > > EE 8 upgrade, but still want to enjoy some MicroProfile technologies. > > > > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
