I will note that I am of course happy to either:

a) track down why that is now included, and remove it if appropriate
b) modify the license/notice files as appropriate

and re-roll.

A note on dependencies - there a is legal report in the original post which
should contain all the details for review. The following dependencies have
been upgraded since 7.0.4:

Tomcat => 8.5.30
CXF => 3.1.15
Johnzon => 1.0.1
OWB => 1.7.5
XBean => 4.9
XmlSchema core => 2.2.3

No other libraries have changed, but I do suggest you verify for yourself
(I have the zips for both 7.0.4 and 7.0.5 in a diff viewer here).

Jon

On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
[email protected]> wrote:

> That library was also present in 7.0.4 Plus.
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It seems we bundle javax.xml.soap-api-1.3.5.jar now in plus flavor (guess
>> it is a "leak" due to some dep upgrade), its license is CDDL+GPL1.1. I
>> didn't see the notice/license work done. Was it intended or as I'm
>> thinking
>> a silent transitive issue?
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-
>> high-performance>
>>
>>
>> Le lun. 9 juil. 2018 à 10:55, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>> [email protected]>
>> a écrit :
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > Build ok
>> > Small demo and test applications running.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>> > http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Alex The Rocker <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hello,
>> > >
>> > > +1 (non binding)
>> > >
>> > > Used this 7.0.5 release candidate to deploy 15+ different web apps
>> > > (including one on Windows, all others on Linux) using very different
>> > > aspects of Java EE.
>> > > All running with ORACLE Server JRE 8 update 172.
>> > > And got no regression as far as we're checking tests results.
>> > >
>> > > But if there's another 7.0.5 build + vote cycle, then upgrading Tomcat
>> > > dependency to Tomcat 8.5.32 (instead of Tomcat 8.5.30 part of this
>> > > vote cycle) would be nice to include this security fix:
>> > > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-8014
>> > >
>> > > Kind regards,
>> > > Alexandre
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 2018-07-04 10:33 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <
>> > > [email protected]>:
>> > > > Hi Everyone,
>> > > >
>> > > > Here is the initial roll of TomEE 7.0.5. Please can you take a look
>> and
>> > > > vote? Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
>> > > >
>> > > > Staging repo:
>> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>> tomee-1113
>> > > >
>> > > > Source zip:
>> > > > /org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.5/tomee-project-7.
>> > > 0.5-source-release.zip
>> > > > <https://repository.apache.org/service/local/
>> > > repositories/orgapachetomee-1113/content/org/apache/tomee/
>> > > tomee-project/7.0.5/tomee-project-7.0.5-source-release.zip>
>> > > >
>> > > > Dist area:
>> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1113/
>> > > >
>> > > > Legal:
>> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1113/legal.zip
>> > > >
>> > > > Keys:
>> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>> > > >
>> > > > Changelog:
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2175?jql=
>> > > > project%20%3D%20TOMEE%20AND%20(status%20%3D%20Resolved%
>> > > > 20OR%20status%20%3D%20CLOSED)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%207.
>> > > > 0.5%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
>> > > >
>> > > > (If anyone knows a better way to get that list, let me know ;-) )
>> > > >
>> > > > Please vote:
>> > > >  +1: Release
>> > > >  -1 Do not release because ...
>> > > >
>> > > > The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At
>> least
>> > 3
>> > > > binding votes).
>> > > >
>> > > > Many thanks
>> > > >
>> > > > Jon
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>

Reply via email to