:s, IMHO we must fix it - or do you see the legal requirements anywhere?

also we have that java-support issue (which beaks cxf/saml support in 7.0.4
since we dont provide guava), do we want to re-release a broken distro
since it has been broken in 7.0.4?

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le lun. 9 juil. 2018 à 11:27, Jonathan Gallimore <
[email protected]> a écrit :

> That library was also present in 7.0.4 Plus.
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > It seems we bundle javax.xml.soap-api-1.3.5.jar now in plus flavor (guess
> > it is a "leak" due to some dep upgrade), its license is CDDL+GPL1.1. I
> > didn't see the notice/license work done. Was it intended or as I'm
> thinking
> > a silent transitive issue?
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
> > rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-
> > ee-8-high-performance>
> >
> >
> > Le lun. 9 juil. 2018 à 10:55, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > [email protected]>
> > a écrit :
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Build ok
> > > Small demo and test applications running.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Alex The Rocker <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non binding)
> > > >
> > > > Used this 7.0.5 release candidate to deploy 15+ different web apps
> > > > (including one on Windows, all others on Linux) using very different
> > > > aspects of Java EE.
> > > > All running with ORACLE Server JRE 8 update 172.
> > > > And got no regression as far as we're checking tests results.
> > > >
> > > > But if there's another 7.0.5 build + vote cycle, then upgrading
> Tomcat
> > > > dependency to Tomcat 8.5.32 (instead of Tomcat 8.5.30 part of this
> > > > vote cycle) would be nice to include this security fix:
> > > > http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-8014
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Alexandre
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2018-07-04 10:33 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > > [email protected]>:
> > > > > Hi Everyone,
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is the initial roll of TomEE 7.0.5. Please can you take a look
> > and
> > > > > vote? Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
> > > > >
> > > > > Staging repo:
> > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > orgapachetomee-1113
> > > > >
> > > > > Source zip:
> > > > > /org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.5/tomee-project-7.
> > > > 0.5-source-release.zip
> > > > > <https://repository.apache.org/service/local/
> > > > repositories/orgapachetomee-1113/content/org/apache/tomee/
> > > > tomee-project/7.0.5/tomee-project-7.0.5-source-release.zip>
> > > > >
> > > > > Dist area:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1113/
> > > > >
> > > > > Legal:
> > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1113/legal.zip
> > > > >
> > > > > Keys:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > Changelog:
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2175?jql=
> > > > > project%20%3D%20TOMEE%20AND%20(status%20%3D%20Resolved%
> > > > > 20OR%20status%20%3D%20CLOSED)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%207.
> > > > > 0.5%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
> > > > >
> > > > > (If anyone knows a better way to get that list, let me know ;-) )
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote:
> > > > >  +1: Release
> > > > >  -1 Do not release because ...
> > > > >
> > > > > The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At
> > least
> > > 3
> > > > > binding votes).
> > > > >
> > > > > Many thanks
> > > > >
> > > > > Jon
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to