Good morning :) > On Aug 8, 2018, at 10:53 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <cgerdo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> We can definitely vote, but would be great if we can way a day or two to >> discuss what we'd be voting and what our status is and how to best address >> our concerns. >> > +1
I maybe jumped the gun. I'm happy to trash the vote I put up if we feel that's best. Or we let it continue and consider it informational and non-binding. >> We all universally agree we want MP in TomEE 8 and are actively working on >> it >> > I am not sure there is an active MP work in TomEE It's not roaring active, but config and jwt are there and passing in TomEE 8 and 7.1. Roberto has done a good chunk of that integration work, obviously Jean-Louis a large part of the JWT support, Jon has indicated in the past a willingness to spin the release. > My understanding of the concern is that we end up ignoring TomEE 8, which >> is a concern I would share. >> > I did not understand what you mean by ignoring TomEE 8 .Can you please a > bit elaborate? Who ignore? This is me attempting to understand the objection to a TomEE 7.1 and apparently doing a bad job of it :) I got the impression the concern was that energy would be shifted away from TomEE 8 to a TomEE 7.1, i.e. TomEE 8 would suffer and be ignored as a result. If that's not the case, I suspect I need someone who is concerned about a 7.1 to say more specifically the concern is. > Perhaps the most effective vote would be to vote to require those who do >> work on a TomEE 7.1 to also submit the same PR to TomEE 8. If a PR comes >> into TomEE 7.1 only and that work is needed in TomEE 8, but there isn't a >> PR, we reject it. >> > -1. Different people can work on TomEE 7.1 and TomEE 8. We need to > differentiate TomEE 7.1 from TomEE 8. TomEE 7.1 is just in there to only > include MP1. We don't want to wait TomEE 7.1 for TomEE 8. I'm ok with us not being that strict. I only proposed it as a compromise to address concerns. I have a growing awareness I haven't clearly understood the concern well enough to address it. I'll shut my mouth for a bit and re-open my ears, hopefully something good will jump in. :) -David
