Hello Gurkan, Sorry I do not understand you point: I replied to the list (using [email protected]) and not just to you. What is your point?
Kind regards, Alexandre Le jeu. 9 août 2018 à 13:56, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > > > Non-binding: > > > > -1 : if there's a lack of resource i'd prefer to see first TomEE > > compatibility with Java 11 LTS addressed as soon as possible (hoping a > > fix for at least https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2200...). > > > > Indeed, Java 11 LTS is supposed to be soon available (25/09 according > > to http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/11/) and most major projects > > (Hadoop, etc.) are waiting for this LTS (Long Term Support) version to > > move beyond Java 8. > > > > I have the felling that any major release from TomEE arriving > > somewhere in November should be as ready as possible to live with this > > "new Java for the couple of upcoming years..." > > > > Thanks, > > Alexandre > > > > Thanks for your input but this VOTE email is not related with your input. > Can you please send a new email with this? (Please don't reply to my email > in this thread :=) Thanks. > Gurkan > > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Alex The Rocker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Non-binding: > > > > -1 : if there's a lack of resource i'd prefer to see first TomEE > > compatibility with Java 11 LTS addressed as soon as possible (hoping a > > fix for at least https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2200...). > > > > Indeed, Java 11 LTS is supposed to be soon available (25/09 according > > to http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/11/) and most major projects > > (Hadoop, etc.) are waiting for this LTS (Long Term Support) version to > > move beyond Java 8. > > > > I have the felling that any major release from TomEE arriving > > somewhere in November should be as ready as possible to live with this > > "new Java for the couple of upcoming years..." > > > > Thanks, > > Alexandre > > Le jeu. 9 août 2018 à 08:09, David Blevins <[email protected]> a > > écrit : > > > > > > For a few months we've discussed doing and not doing a TomEE 7 flavored > > release of MicroProfile 1.x for Java EE 7 users on Java 8, tentatively > > versioned TomEE 7.1. > > > > > > Earliest email with TomEE 7.1 in the subject is around April, though I > > vaguely recall it mentioned before. I recall seeing a request from Mark to > > wait on it till after 7.0.5 was released. That's now out and a TomEE 7.1.x > > branch has been created and being actively worked on. > > > > > > There seem to be concerns that this will draw attention away from TomEE > > 8, which is understandable, and some sentiment that this work should stop > > and everyone focus on TomEE 8. I haven't seen anyone suggest not working > > on TomEE 8, so I'll assume that as a constant that doesn't need to be voted > > on. > > > > > > As the concern is largely resources, I propose the following compromise: > > > > > > - MicroProfile related PRs that can possibly apply to TomEE 8 must be > > merged to master *before* the equivalent can be merged to TomEE 7.1.x. In > > short, everyone must work on TomEE 8. > > > > > > - Those who wish to focus time only on TomEE 8 may do so, someone else > > can merge the PR to 7.1.x if they have the energy. In short, only the > > willing need work on TomEE 7.1.x > > > > > > With this in mind, the vote: > > > > > > +1 Allow work on TomEE 7.1 to proceed with the above two conditions > > > +-O Abstain or don't feel strongly > > > -1 I have a better idea > > > > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > >
