I don't think another thread is required, unless further discussion (hopefully on the actual work, rather than whether to do it or not) is needed. I think Alex's reading of the VOTE was valid, the concern are valid, and the feedback is useful.
Jon On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > @Gurkan: there is no need to do a vote for java 11 support, we have to > support it anyway or it means the server is dead and we move it to attic. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/ > rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java- > ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le jeu. 9 août 2018 à 14:23, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> a écrit > : > > > > > > > Sorry I do not understand you point: I replied to the list (using > > > [email protected]) and not just to you. > > > What is your point? > > > > > I see but this is a VOTE thread regarding MP in TomEE. Please send a new > > email to dev@ list for Java 11 LTS support issue > > Regards. > > Gurkan > > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:04 PM, Alex The Rocker <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello Gurkan, > > > > > > Sorry I do not understand you point: I replied to the list (using > > > [email protected]) and not just to you. > > > What is your point? > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > Alexandre > > > Le jeu. 9 août 2018 à 13:56, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> a > > écrit > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Non-binding: > > > > > > > > > > -1 : if there's a lack of resource i'd prefer to see first TomEE > > > > > compatibility with Java 11 LTS addressed as soon as possible > (hoping > > a > > > > > fix for at least https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2200. > .. > > ). > > > > > > > > > > Indeed, Java 11 LTS is supposed to be soon available (25/09 > according > > > > > to http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/11/) and most major > projects > > > > > (Hadoop, etc.) are waiting for this LTS (Long Term Support) version > > to > > > > > move beyond Java 8. > > > > > > > > > > I have the felling that any major release from TomEE arriving > > > > > somewhere in November should be as ready as possible to live with > > this > > > > > "new Java for the couple of upcoming years..." > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Alexandre > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for your input but this VOTE email is not related with your > > > input. > > > > Can you please send a new email with this? (Please don't reply to my > > > email > > > > in this thread :=) Thanks. > > > > Gurkan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Alex The Rocker < > [email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Non-binding: > > > > > > > > > > -1 : if there's a lack of resource i'd prefer to see first TomEE > > > > > compatibility with Java 11 LTS addressed as soon as possible > (hoping > > a > > > > > fix for at least https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2200. > .. > > ). > > > > > > > > > > Indeed, Java 11 LTS is supposed to be soon available (25/09 > according > > > > > to http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk/11/) and most major > projects > > > > > (Hadoop, etc.) are waiting for this LTS (Long Term Support) version > > to > > > > > move beyond Java 8. > > > > > > > > > > I have the felling that any major release from TomEE arriving > > > > > somewhere in November should be as ready as possible to live with > > this > > > > > "new Java for the couple of upcoming years..." > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Alexandre > > > > > Le jeu. 9 août 2018 à 08:09, David Blevins < > [email protected]> > > a > > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > > For a few months we've discussed doing and not doing a TomEE 7 > > > flavored > > > > > release of MicroProfile 1.x for Java EE 7 users on Java 8, > > tentatively > > > > > versioned TomEE 7.1. > > > > > > > > > > > > Earliest email with TomEE 7.1 in the subject is around April, > > though > > > I > > > > > vaguely recall it mentioned before. I recall seeing a request from > > > Mark to > > > > > wait on it till after 7.0.5 was released. That's now out and a > TomEE > > > 7.1.x > > > > > branch has been created and being actively worked on. > > > > > > > > > > > > There seem to be concerns that this will draw attention away from > > > TomEE > > > > > 8, which is understandable, and some sentiment that this work > should > > > stop > > > > > and everyone focus on TomEE 8. I haven't seen anyone suggest not > > > working > > > > > on TomEE 8, so I'll assume that as a constant that doesn't need to > be > > > voted > > > > > on. > > > > > > > > > > > > As the concern is largely resources, I propose the following > > > compromise: > > > > > > > > > > > > - MicroProfile related PRs that can possibly apply to TomEE 8 > must > > > be > > > > > merged to master *before* the equivalent can be merged to TomEE > > 7.1.x. > > > In > > > > > short, everyone must work on TomEE 8. > > > > > > > > > > > > - Those who wish to focus time only on TomEE 8 may do so, > someone > > > else > > > > > can merge the PR to 7.1.x if they have the energy. In short, only > > the > > > > > willing need work on TomEE 7.1.x > > > > > > > > > > > > With this in mind, the vote: > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 Allow work on TomEE 7.1 to proceed with the above two > > conditions > > > > > > +-O Abstain or don't feel strongly > > > > > > -1 I have a better idea > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
