I’m wondering if we don’t have to go through some legal process first to make sure that we can whatever logo wins?
> On 3 Jan 2019, at 11:33, Jonathan Gallimore <jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I'm generally ok with this, and it looks like there is plenty of support > for it. Some questions: > > * would we include the existing proposals? > * I think 1 week is fine for the final vote, but wonder if we'd want to > allow a bit longer to create the actual submissions? > > The ASF voting process is documented here: > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html - I can't see any reason why > we couldn't use GitHub for that, but I think we'd need to post a thread on > this mailing list (and probably the user mailing list as well) so its very > clear. > > Jon > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:52 PM Ivan Junckes Filho <ivanjunc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> The idea I had in mind is: >> >> 1 - Give a 1 week time for people to advocate for a logo. (Share the logo >> in github issue) >> 2 - Give a 1 week time for voting (we would gather all the logos that >> people advocated for and add to another github issue and ask for thumbs up) >> >> The logo that gets more thumbs up in a range of a week wins! >> >> So, not asking for +1 in a specific logo, but for the willingness of the >> community to choose a logo using a poll mechanism. >> >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 11:37 AM Richard Monson-Haefel < >> monsonhae...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ivan, >>> >>> Your call to action on this is awesome but what exactly are we +1ing >>> about? The act of considering a logo or are we +1ing David's Logo (by >> the >>> way the link on your post didn't work for me personally). >>> >>> thanks! >>> >>> Richard >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:40 AM Ivan Junckes Filho <ivanjunc...@gmail.com >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Would be nice to get some +1 or -1 from some committers here :) >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 9:31 PM Bruno Baptista <bruno...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> Bruno Baptista >>>>> https://twitter.com/brunobat_ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 28/12/18 16:32, Ivan Junckes Filho wrote: >>>>>> Hey guys, we have been through this discussion before but I don't >>> think >>>>> we >>>>>> ever had a conclusion. In my opinion would be very important for >> the >>>>>> project to have a logo and now TomEE is getting a lot of exposure >> why >>>> not >>>>>> take advantage of the moment and promote TomEE even more with a >> great >>>>> logo? >>>>>> >>>>>> These are some options proposed in the past: >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-574 >>>>>> >>>>>> We could do something like David did here for JakartaEE: >>>>>> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/ee4j/issues/11 >>>>>> >>>>>> And the winning logo would be the one with the most number of >> thumbs >>>> up. >>>>>> >>>>>> What do you guys think? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Richard Monson-Haefel >>> https://twitter.com/rmonson >>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/monsonhaefel/ >>> >>
