Well I think that would be disappointing. I think that all the logos submitted for voting should be cleared out on any legal issues first and then only voted on the compliant ones.
> On 3 Jan 2019, at 11:47, Ivan Junckes Filho <ivanjunc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Roberto, if the logo has legal problems won't be an issue, as we can take > the next most voted one. > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 9:44 AM Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> > wrote: > >> I’m wondering if we don’t have to go through some legal process first to >> make sure that we can whatever logo wins? >> >>> On 3 Jan 2019, at 11:33, Jonathan Gallimore < >> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'm generally ok with this, and it looks like there is plenty of support >>> for it. Some questions: >>> >>> * would we include the existing proposals? >>> * I think 1 week is fine for the final vote, but wonder if we'd want to >>> allow a bit longer to create the actual submissions? >>> >>> The ASF voting process is documented here: >>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html - I can't see any reason >> why >>> we couldn't use GitHub for that, but I think we'd need to post a thread >> on >>> this mailing list (and probably the user mailing list as well) so its >> very >>> clear. >>> >>> Jon >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:52 PM Ivan Junckes Filho <ivanjunc...@gmail.com >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> The idea I had in mind is: >>>> >>>> 1 - Give a 1 week time for people to advocate for a logo. (Share the >> logo >>>> in github issue) >>>> 2 - Give a 1 week time for voting (we would gather all the logos that >>>> people advocated for and add to another github issue and ask for thumbs >> up) >>>> >>>> The logo that gets more thumbs up in a range of a week wins! >>>> >>>> So, not asking for +1 in a specific logo, but for the willingness of the >>>> community to choose a logo using a poll mechanism. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 11:37 AM Richard Monson-Haefel < >>>> monsonhae...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Ivan, >>>>> >>>>> Your call to action on this is awesome but what exactly are we +1ing >>>>> about? The act of considering a logo or are we +1ing David's Logo (by >>>> the >>>>> way the link on your post didn't work for me personally). >>>>> >>>>> thanks! >>>>> >>>>> Richard >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:40 AM Ivan Junckes Filho < >> ivanjunc...@gmail.com >>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Would be nice to get some +1 or -1 from some committers here :) >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 9:31 PM Bruno Baptista <bruno...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bruno Baptista >>>>>>> https://twitter.com/brunobat_ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 28/12/18 16:32, Ivan Junckes Filho wrote: >>>>>>>> Hey guys, we have been through this discussion before but I don't >>>>> think >>>>>>> we >>>>>>>> ever had a conclusion. In my opinion would be very important for >>>> the >>>>>>>> project to have a logo and now TomEE is getting a lot of exposure >>>> why >>>>>> not >>>>>>>> take advantage of the moment and promote TomEE even more with a >>>> great >>>>>>> logo? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> These are some options proposed in the past: >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-574 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We could do something like David did here for JakartaEE: >>>>>>>> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/ee4j/issues/11 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And the winning logo would be the one with the most number of >>>> thumbs >>>>>> up. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What do you guys think? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Richard Monson-Haefel >>>>> https://twitter.com/rmonson >>>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/monsonhaefel/ >>>>> >>>> >> >>
