I will begin on getting the docker images updated. Thanks, Rod.
On 6/22/20, 7:39 PM, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> wrote: It's incredibly amazing what we've all done. We should all be very proud. It takes a lot of work to get off the idea stage with bytecode transformation. It takes a lot of work to close the last issues. It takes a big effort to get a vote across the finish line at all, let alone this fast. The last time I saw a vote clear this quickly was TomEE 1.0.0 beta 1 in October 4th, 2011, the day before JavaOne 2011. I'm going to take this as a sign. The good-ol-days are ahead of us :) Massive thank you and congratulations to everyone. Get ready to do some retweeting tomorrow! -David > On Jun 22, 2020, at 6:43 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > Thank you for voting. The following +1 votes were cast: > > Thiago Henrique Hupner > Cesar Hernandez > Ivan Junckes Filho > Nishant Raut > Daniel Dias Dos Santos > David Jencks (binding) > David Blevins (binding) > Jonathan Gallimore (binding) > > With 8 +1's and no other votes, this vote passes. Thank you everyone for > your reviews and votes. I'll promote these artifacts and complete the > release. > > Jon > > > On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 2:01 PM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M1 and Apache >> TomEE 8.0.3. >> >> There's some background on this release here: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r1d89e3c1cd9dba9695e059c96efc8af0d68f18e40c4d4c688801db8d%40%3Cdev.tomee.apache.org%3E >> >> The key points here are: >> >> * TomEE 8.0.3 is essentially identical to TomEE 8.0.2, bar some changes to >> examples. Release notes are below. >> >> * TomEE 9.0.0-M1 is a transformed version of TomEE 8.0.3, to shift TomEE >> and all its dependencies from the javax to jakarta namespace. >> >> * If you're targeting Jakarta EE 8, use TomEE 8.0.3. If you would like to >> try out Jakarta EE 9, with the new namespace, try TomEE 9.0.0-M1. If you >> build the examples, for most of them you should get a `javax` version and a >> `jakarta` version. Moviefun is a good app to use to play around. >> >> * TomEE 8.0.3 is production-ready. TomEE 9.0.0-M1 is a milestone. We'd >> love you to try it, kick the tyres and provide feedback. There will likely >> be a few milestone releases before we get to a production-ready 9.0.0. >> >> * We expect things to not work with the 9.0.0-M1 version. Feedback is >> gratefully received, but will be addressed with subsequent releases. >> Genuine show-stopper issues, such as legal issues, should be voted -1, but >> bugs or functionality in the 9.0.0-M1 should not prevent this release going >> ahead. If you have questions around this, please let us know. >> >> * Both versions are built from the same codebase, hence the single vote. >> >> * This vote includes the release of a patch plugin: >> https://github.com/apache/tomee-patch-plugin, and one separate single >> module to do the translation work for the jakarta version: >> https://github.com/apache/tomee-jakarta. I'm expecting the >> tomee-jakara repo to be removed and the module bought back under the tomee >> tree when we can work out the build issues there. >> >> Maven Repo: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1172/ >> >> Binaries & Source: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1172/tomee-8.0.3/ >> >> Tags: >> >> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.3 >> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-patch-plugin.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-patch-parent-0.1 >> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M1 >> >> Release notes: >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12348219 >> >> Please VOTE: >> >> [+1] Yes, release it >> [+0] Not fussed >> [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what the >> showstopper is) >> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours. >> >> Here is my +1. >> >> Thanks >> >> Jon >>