Yep, exactly.

I will check the tomee-myfaces integration codebase now, if everything is
still valid for 3.0. So we could maybe just replace the JAR via maven build.

Am Mi., 30. Sept. 2020 um 14:47 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
[email protected]>:

> Yes namespace is everywhere in content parameters and in xml files. That's
> the issue. So as far as I can understand if we move TomEE 8 to new myfaces
> then we'll break EE 8 apps
>
> Le mer. 30 sept. 2020 à 12:38, Thomas Andraschko <
> [email protected]> a écrit :
>
> > Might work.
> >
> > I just aligned the changes with mojarra and they also changed e.g. xml
> > namespaces.
> > - So its replacing javax in packages, request params, context params
> > - new XML namespaces
> >
> > I will probably check newer commits in mojarra and do a RC2 soon
> >
> > Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]> schrieb am Mi., 30.
> Sep.
> > 2020, 12:07:
> >
> > > If its a drop-in replacement, we can probably handle that in the Maven
> > > build. I'm curious about the change though; I was under the impression
> > that
> > > Jakarta EE 9, was a namespace-only change?
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:20 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > We are probably reaching the limit of the Eclipse Transformer for
> > > Jakarta.
> > > > I'll start a new thread dedicated to that discussion
> > > > --
> > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:18 AM Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > oh, then it wont work.
> > > > > MyFaces 3.0 e.g. also changes context param and requests params,
> > that's
> > > > > really exclusive for EE9.
> > > > >
> > > > > How can we proceed then? Create a EE9 branch?
> > > > > Otherwise i dont think we can make it work easily.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Thomas
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Mi., 30. Sept. 2020 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > > > > [email protected]>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hey Thomas.
> > > > > > Yes sure, we can open a ticket and do the dep upgrade.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The issue is that we don't really have any EE 9 branch.
> > > > > > We work on EE 8 for master and we do use the Jakarta EE
> Transformer
> > > to
> > > > > > generate the EE 9 compatible binaries based on EE 8.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If MyFaces 3 is EE 8 compatible, then I don't see any issue doing
> > the
> > > > > > upgrade.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:12 AM Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > up
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Am Mo., 21. Sept. 2020 um 10:37 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > > > > [email protected]>:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hey Guys,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We recently released MyFaces 3.0 RC1.
> > > > > > > > I think we have to use it for 9.0?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to