Jon will be answer to answer this one, but yes the Eclipse Transformer can also look for strings (constants) to replace -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 3:01 PM Thomas Andraschko < [email protected]> wrote: > Looks like it SHOULD still work with MF 3.0. > Will this string > > https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/tomee/tomee-myfaces/src/main/java/org/apache/tomee/myfaces/TomEEWebConfigProvider.java#L40 > also be replaced with jakarta? > > Am Mi., 30. Sept. 2020 um 14:53 Uhr schrieb Thomas Andraschko < > [email protected]>: > > > Yep, exactly. > > > > I will check the tomee-myfaces integration codebase now, if everything is > > still valid for 3.0. So we could maybe just replace the JAR via maven > build. > > > > Am Mi., 30. Sept. 2020 um 14:47 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > [email protected]>: > > > >> Yes namespace is everywhere in content parameters and in xml files. > That's > >> the issue. So as far as I can understand if we move TomEE 8 to new > myfaces > >> then we'll break EE 8 apps > >> > >> Le mer. 30 sept. 2020 à 12:38, Thomas Andraschko < > >> [email protected]> a écrit : > >> > >> > Might work. > >> > > >> > I just aligned the changes with mojarra and they also changed e.g. xml > >> > namespaces. > >> > - So its replacing javax in packages, request params, context params > >> > - new XML namespaces > >> > > >> > I will probably check newer commits in mojarra and do a RC2 soon > >> > > >> > Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]> schrieb am Mi., 30. > >> Sep. > >> > 2020, 12:07: > >> > > >> > > If its a drop-in replacement, we can probably handle that in the > Maven > >> > > build. I'm curious about the change though; I was under the > impression > >> > that > >> > > Jakarta EE 9, was a namespace-only change? > >> > > > >> > > Jon > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 10:20 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro < > >> > > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > We are probably reaching the limit of the Eclipse Transformer for > >> > > Jakarta. > >> > > > I'll start a new thread dedicated to that discussion > >> > > > -- > >> > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > >> > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >> > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:18 AM Thomas Andraschko < > >> > > > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > oh, then it wont work. > >> > > > > MyFaces 3.0 e.g. also changes context param and requests params, > >> > that's > >> > > > > really exclusive for EE9. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > How can we proceed then? Create a EE9 branch? > >> > > > > Otherwise i dont think we can make it work easily. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Best regards, > >> > > > > Thomas > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Am Mi., 30. Sept. 2020 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro > < > >> > > > > [email protected]>: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hey Thomas. > >> > > > > > Yes sure, we can open a ticket and do the dep upgrade. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > The issue is that we don't really have any EE 9 branch. > >> > > > > > We work on EE 8 for master and we do use the Jakarta EE > >> Transformer > >> > > to > >> > > > > > generate the EE 9 compatible binaries based on EE 8. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > If MyFaces 3 is EE 8 compatible, then I don't see any issue > >> doing > >> > the > >> > > > > > upgrade. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > >> > > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > >> > > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > >> > > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 11:12 AM Thomas Andraschko < > >> > > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > up > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Am Mo., 21. Sept. 2020 um 10:37 Uhr schrieb Thomas > Andraschko > >> < > >> > > > > > > [email protected]>: > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hey Guys, > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > We recently released MyFaces 3.0 RC1. > >> > > > > > > > I think we have to use it for 9.0? > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
