rmannibucau commented on pull request #759: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/759#issuecomment-768460797
@rzo1 thinking out loud but if 3 is literally 'it is there we don't want to invest" maybe do a "openejb-junit5-backward" (name is aweful but I know awesome people to find name in the project ;)) which keep using openajb-junit - just as API - and just add the junit5 glue code excluding junit artifact. This seems matching more exactly this description and enables the project to make this part slowly dying to align the maintenance on the usage? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
