> > They even work locally. Might bei Jenkins / CI related?
It could be, I've been also following up with an issue on the Jenkins Job we have for Pull request. My proposal would be to start migrating the jobs to Jenkins pipelines so we can have a better way to collaborate in the jobs configuration. El mar, 2 feb 2021 a las 10:43, Zowalla, Richard (< [email protected]>) escribió: > Hi Cesar, > > it seems, that the master build is fine again. The last run did succeed, > so I guess the tests failed with some sort of race condition. They even > work locally. Might bei Jenkins / CI related? > > Gruss > Richard > > ________________________________________ > Von: Cesar Hernandez [[email protected]] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Februar 2021 17:05 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: TomEE-2966: JUnit5 OpenEJB Extension Module - Any thoughts? > > Hi Richard, > > Thank you for the PR and context provided. > We now have back the Jenkins job on master at demand, I left yesterday a > build[1] and after 6 hours we got 4 tests[2] but as far as I can see they > are not related to this new extension module :). > > > > [1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/TomEE/job/master-build-full/72/ > [2] > org.apache.ziplock.maven.MvnTest.main > org.apache.ziplock.maven.MvnTest.test > org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest.org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest > org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest.org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest > > > > El lun, 1 feb 2021 a las 3:12, Zowalla, Richard (< > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > I went ahead with it and merged it. This shouldn't influence anything > > on the master as it is just a new module. > > > > However, it enables some of our users to upgrade their legacy testing > > (without application composer or arquillian) environments to pure > > junit5. > > > > Gruss > > Richard > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 27.01.2021, 17:25 +0000 schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > a few days ago, I had a (virtual) coffee discussion with my colleguae > > > Martin W. about moving some of our research projects towards pure > > > JUnit > > > 5. > > > > > > The missing thing: An openejb-junit module, which comes without a > > > transient compile dependency towards junit4. > > > > > > Today, I had some time and implemented a first draft towards an > > > additional openejb-junit5 module, which does not depend on junit4 > > > anymore. > > > > > > The PR is open for discussion / review, see [1]. > > > > > > If someone has additional ideas, thoughts or improvements, I would be > > > very happy about them! > > > > > > Gruss > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/759 > > -- > > Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. > > Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics > > > > Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences > > Max-Planck-Str. 39 > > D-74081 Heilbronn > > phone: +49 7131 504 6791 > > mail: [email protected] > > web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/ > > > > > -- > Atentamente: > César Hernández. > -- Atentamente: César Hernández.
