I agree. Would be awesome to have something more stable. It's better than it was. But still some work to do.
Le ven. 5 févr. 2021 à 19:55, Zowalla, Richard < [email protected]> a écrit : > Hi Cesar, > > would be very much appreciated, I guess. > > I noticed, that the PR jenkins job shows a different behaviour compared to > the master job in terms of reproducability. > In general, we should have a deeper look at the config to make the CI > behave more robust. > > Gruss > Richard > -- > Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. > Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter > > Medizinische Informatik > Hochschule Heilbronn > Max-Planck-Str. 39 > D-74081 Heilbronn > > Mail: [email protected] > > > ________________________________________ > Von: Cesar Hernandez [[email protected]] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Februar 2021 22:01 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: TomEE-2966: JUnit5 OpenEJB Extension Module - Any thoughts? > > > > > They even work locally. Might bei Jenkins / CI related? > > > It could be, I've been also following up with an issue on the Jenkins Job > we have for Pull request. > > My proposal would be to start migrating the jobs to Jenkins pipelines so we > can have a better way to collaborate in the jobs configuration. > > > El mar, 2 feb 2021 a las 10:43, Zowalla, Richard (< > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > Hi Cesar, > > > > it seems, that the master build is fine again. The last run did succeed, > > so I guess the tests failed with some sort of race condition. They even > > work locally. Might bei Jenkins / CI related? > > > > Gruss > > Richard > > > > ________________________________________ > > Von: Cesar Hernandez [[email protected]] > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Februar 2021 17:05 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: TomEE-2966: JUnit5 OpenEJB Extension Module - Any thoughts? > > > > Hi Richard, > > > > Thank you for the PR and context provided. > > We now have back the Jenkins job on master at demand, I left yesterday a > > build[1] and after 6 hours we got 4 tests[2] but as far as I can see they > > are not related to this new extension module :). > > > > > > > > [1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/TomEE/job/master-build-full/72/ > > [2] > > org.apache.ziplock.maven.MvnTest.main > > org.apache.ziplock.maven.MvnTest.test > > org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest.org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest > > org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest.org.superbiz.mvc.MvcTest > > > > > > > > El lun, 1 feb 2021 a las 3:12, Zowalla, Richard (< > > [email protected]>) escribió: > > > > > I went ahead with it and merged it. This shouldn't influence anything > > > on the master as it is just a new module. > > > > > > However, it enables some of our users to upgrade their legacy testing > > > (without application composer or arquillian) environments to pure > > > junit5. > > > > > > Gruss > > > Richard > > > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 27.01.2021, 17:25 +0000 schrieb Zowalla, Richard: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > a few days ago, I had a (virtual) coffee discussion with my colleguae > > > > Martin W. about moving some of our research projects towards pure > > > > JUnit > > > > 5. > > > > > > > > The missing thing: An openejb-junit module, which comes without a > > > > transient compile dependency towards junit4. > > > > > > > > Today, I had some time and implemented a first draft towards an > > > > additional openejb-junit5 module, which does not depend on junit4 > > > > anymore. > > > > > > > > The PR is open for discussion / review, see [1]. > > > > > > > > If someone has additional ideas, thoughts or improvements, I would be > > > > very happy about them! > > > > > > > > Gruss > > > > Richard > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/759 > > > -- > > > Richard Zowalla, M.Sc. > > > Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics > > > > > > Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences > > > Max-Planck-Str. 39 > > > D-74081 Heilbronn > > > phone: +49 7131 504 6791 > > > mail: [email protected] > > > web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/ > > > > > > > > > -- > > Atentamente: > > César Hernández. > > > > > -- > Atentamente: > César Hernández. >
