+1 for A (same reasons as already mentioned) Gruss Richard
Am Mittwoch, den 07.04.2021, 20:29 -0300 schrieb Daniel Dias Dos Santos: > Hello everyone, > > I also vote +1 for option A, I believe it will be a great opportunity > to > have TomEE as a compatible product. > > > Em ter., 6 de abr. de 2021 às 18:42, Cesar Hernandez < > [email protected]> > escreveu: > > > +1 for Option A, since this enables smooth understanding and > > navigation for > > users and developers over ASF projects and their compatibility over > > JakartaEE. > > Having this bridge between the ASF project and Jakarta EE would be > > a good > > synergy in the ecosystem. > > > > El dom, 28 mar 2021 a las 2:27, Alex The Rocker (< > > [email protected]>) > > escribió: > > > > > +1 for Option A : it think it would be a nice way to promote > > > TomEE to > > > a large audience, while not involving too much overhead since, as > > > I > > > understand, TomEE developers are already using TCK tests for > > > validation purposes. > > > > > > Le dim. 28 mars 2021 à 01:05, David Blevins < > > > [email protected]> a > > > écrit : > > > > Please see Rob Tompkins' email "[jarkarta-ee] Is there apatite > > > > to ever > > > use Jakarta EE logos on the TomEE site" > > > > This vote is strictly limited to 1) getting Jakarta EE Platform > > > > and > > > Jakarta EE Web Profile implementations at the ASF listed on the > > jakarta.ee > > > compatible products page[1] and 2) use of the "Jakarta EE > > > Compatible"[2] > > > logo on apache.org websites. > > > > The rules for either of these require you to be a member of the > > > > Jakarta > > > EE Working Group. > > > > As I've been on the Working Group from the start and knew this > > > > would be > > > affecting us as Apache is is not a member of the Working Group, > > > I've > > > ensured we have two options. The vote is to gather feedback on > > > which of > > > the two options you prefer. > > > > - Option A: Apache joins the Jakarta EE Working Group and > > > > gains the > > > ability to get Apache TomEE and any other ASF Jakarta EE Platform > > > and > > > Jakarta EE Web Profile implementations listed on the compatible > > > products > > > page[1]. As a Member, Apache TomEE and any other ASF Jakarta EE > > > Platform > > > and Jakarta EE Web Profile implementations can use the "Jakarta > > > EE > > > Compatible"[2] logo on tomee.apache.org and other *.apache.org > > > sites. > > In > > > this path the TCK results summary of tests passed must be hosted > > > on > > > tomee.apache.org for each certified server version, tck version, > > > jdk and > > > os combination. The entry for Apache TomEE on the jakarta.ee > > > website > > > will contain one link to tomee.apache.org for the TCK results > > > summary > > and > > > one link to download Apache TomEE at tomee.apache.org. > > > > - Option B: Apache does not join, however, Strategic Members > > > > of the > > > Jakarta EE Working Group could get Apache TomEE listed on the > > > compatible > > > products page[1] as an open source implementation they > > > support. As > > Apache > > > is not itself a member, we would not be able to use the "Jakarta > > > EE > > > Compatible"[2] logo on tomee.apache.org. We could use the > > > general > > > Jakarta EE logo, however. In this path the project does not need > > > to host > > > TCK result summaries on tomee.apache.org. The entry for Apache > > > TomEE on > > > the jakarta.ee website will contain one link to said Strategic > > > Member's > > > website for the TCK results summary and one link to download > > > Apache TomEE > > > at tomee.apache.org. > > > > I'm confident we can make either work. > > > > > > > > This vote will close on April 14th so Rob can make his > > > > recommendation > > to > > > the Board in time for the April 21st Board > > > Meeting. Additionally, the > > > Jakarta EE 9.1 release is scheduled to go up for vote end of > > > April and > > > there is some chance we could be compatible by then. > > > > Note: Even if we vote A, that does not guarantee Apache will > > > > join the > > > Working Group. It would just be an indication that's what we > > > desire. > > The > > > desires of all projects and the foundation in general will be > > > considered > > > and it's ultimately Rob and the Board who make this decision. > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://jakarta.ee/compatibility/ > > > > [2] > > > https://jakarta.ee/images/jakarta/jakarta-ee-compatible-logo-color.svg > > > > > > > -- > > Atentamente: > > César Hernández. > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
