Sounds good guys…I can make sure that I take this to the Board meeting next week, and I’ll take this back over to the jcp list.
Cheers, -Rob > On Apr 8, 2021, at 5:35 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'd prefer option A. > > Jon > > On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 12:05 AM David Blevins <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Please see Rob Tompkins' email "[jarkarta-ee] Is there apatite to ever use >> Jakarta EE logos on the TomEE site" >> >> This vote is strictly limited to 1) getting Jakarta EE Platform and >> Jakarta EE Web Profile implementations at the ASF listed on the jakarta.ee >> compatible products page[1] and 2) use of the "Jakarta EE Compatible"[2] >> logo on apache.org websites. >> >> The rules for either of these require you to be a member of the Jakarta EE >> Working Group. >> >> As I've been on the Working Group from the start and knew this would be >> affecting us as Apache is is not a member of the Working Group, I've >> ensured we have two options. The vote is to gather feedback on which of >> the two options you prefer. >> >> - Option A: Apache joins the Jakarta EE Working Group and gains the >> ability to get Apache TomEE and any other ASF Jakarta EE Platform and >> Jakarta EE Web Profile implementations listed on the compatible products >> page[1]. As a Member, Apache TomEE and any other ASF Jakarta EE Platform >> and Jakarta EE Web Profile implementations can use the "Jakarta EE >> Compatible"[2] logo on tomee.apache.org and other *.apache.org sites. In >> this path the TCK results summary of tests passed must be hosted on >> tomee.apache.org for each certified server version, tck version, jdk and >> os combination. The entry for Apache TomEE on the jakarta.ee website >> will contain one link to tomee.apache.org for the TCK results summary and >> one link to download Apache TomEE at tomee.apache.org. >> >> - Option B: Apache does not join, however, Strategic Members of the >> Jakarta EE Working Group could get Apache TomEE listed on the compatible >> products page[1] as an open source implementation they support. As Apache >> is not itself a member, we would not be able to use the "Jakarta EE >> Compatible"[2] logo on tomee.apache.org. We could use the general >> Jakarta EE logo, however. In this path the project does not need to host >> TCK result summaries on tomee.apache.org. The entry for Apache TomEE on >> the jakarta.ee website will contain one link to said Strategic Member's >> website for the TCK results summary and one link to download Apache TomEE >> at tomee.apache.org. >> >> I'm confident we can make either work. >> >> This vote will close on April 14th so Rob can make his recommendation to >> the Board in time for the April 21st Board Meeting. Additionally, the >> Jakarta EE 9.1 release is scheduled to go up for vote end of April and >> there is some chance we could be compatible by then. >> >> Note: Even if we vote A, that does not guarantee Apache will join the >> Working Group. It would just be an indication that's what we desire. The >> desires of all projects and the foundation in general will be considered >> and it's ultimately Rob and the Board who make this decision. >> >> >> -David >> >> >> [1] https://jakarta.ee/compatibility/ >> [2] https://jakarta.ee/images/jakarta/jakarta-ee-compatible-logo-color.svg
