Correction: in favour for keeping ist in 8.x.x. and maybe remove it in the next 
major version. Grüess it requires a separate discussion...
________________________________
Von: Zowalla, Richard <[email protected]>
Gesendet: Montag, 20. September 2021 19:36:22
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: TomEE & Java 17

don't know. David was hard in favour for it (feature removal in the
next major version, i.e. 9.x.x) - at least this was the discussion in
Nov 2020.

Am Montag, dem 20.09.2021 um 19:14 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> do we really need corba anymore?
>
> Am Mo., 20. Sept. 2021 um 18:53 Uhr schrieb Zowalla, Richard <
> [email protected]>:
>
> > I think that there are two different ideas / thoughts in here:
> >
> > (a) JDK / JRE 17 Runtime: Be able to deploy and operate a TomEE
> > with a
> > Java 17 environment. This might be solvable by adding JVM options
> > (as
> > mentioned by Thiago and Vicente) or doing some rework of the proxy
> > factory (looks like a solution without the JVM flags as mentioned
> > by
> > Jon)
> >
> > (b) _Compiling_ TomEE with JDK 11+
> >
> > For (b) and Corba:
> >
> > I had worked on it a in 2020 and had two drafts. In May, we had
> > some
> > issues with a force push to master, which closed / killed all open
> > PRs,
> > which render the diff nearly useless. The drafts:
> >
> > - https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/713 (use byte code
> > generation at
> > build time -> drawbacks as mentioned by Romain)
> >
> > - https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/792 (using SPI to lookup a
> > corba
> > integration module, which can be compiled with Java 8 and is not
> > included in the main tomee project. I guess it would require some
> > cleanup / update and the open tasks adressed.
> >
> >
> > PR 721 had some open questions, which I couldn't resolve at the
> > time it
> > was created. It might be worth to pick up the work on a J11+ build.
> > The
> > mail discussion is located here [1].
> >
> > Gruss
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> > [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg14097.html
> >
> > Am Montag, dem 20.09.2021 um 10:28 -0600 schrieb Memo Díaz Solis:
> > >  I just tested by myself (regarding the CORBA stuff) and of
> > > course
> > > got the
> > > issue you mentioned. Is there any alternative besides the
> > > glassfish
> > > jar you
> > > guys might know? or do we want to remove CORBA at all?
> > > <dependency>
> > >     <groupId>org.glassfish.packager</groupId>
> > >     <artifactId>glassfish-corba-omgapi</artifactId>
> > >     <version></version>
> > > </dependency>
> > >
> > > El lun, 20 sept 2021 a las 9:42, Vicente Rossello (<
> > > [email protected]>)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > My two cents...
> > > >
> > > > I've tried the examples, don't know how to fix it permanently,
> > > > but
> > > > I've
> > > > noticed two things:
> > > > * Lombok should be upgraded to 1.18.20 to be able to compile
> > > > with
> > > > JDK16+ (
> > > > https://projectlombok.org/changelog )
> > > > * OrbFactory does not compile in JDK11+ as well. I don't really
> > > > know if
> > > > CORBA is still used by anyone
> > > >
> > > > I've been running tomee in JDK17 for some time now, everything
> > > > works fine
> > > > (there are 4 add-opens in catalina.bat / catalina.sh).
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 1:21 PM Zowalla, Richard <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for the additional hint. It fixes the test, but I
> > > > > still
> > > > > think,
> > > > > that we should make a permanent (code-based) fix ;)
> > > > >
> > > > > I have created a related JIRA:
> > > > >
> > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3795
> > > > >
> > > > > In addition, it looks like
> > > > >
> > > > > - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2744
> > > > >
> > > > > is another thingy for J16 / J17.
> > > > >
> > > > > Perhaps we should create a tracking issue (JDK17
> > > > > compatibility)
> > > > > to
> > > > > aggregate the different issues to tackle.
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Montag, dem 20.09.2021 um 07:45 -0300 schrieb Thiago
> > > > > Henrique
> > > > > Hupner:
> > > > > > The easy fix is to replace the illegal access to - - add-
> > > > > > opens
> > > > > > and -
> > > > > > -
> > > > > > add-exports.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The exception message includes which one is required.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Em seg., 20 de set. de 2021 07:34, Zowalla, Richard <
> > > > > > [email protected]> escreveu:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I think that's the approach taken by the guys at
> > > > > > > deltaspike
> > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > Thomas'
> > > > > > > link [1] (and the related PR in [2]).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DELTASPIKE-1432
> > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/deltaspike/pull/119
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Am Montag, dem 20.09.2021 um 11:09 +0100 schrieb Jonathan
> > > > > > > Gallimore:
> > > > > > > > I had a very quick look - I wonder if we simply need to
> > > > > > > > move to
> > > > > > > > MethodHandles.Lookup.defineClass():
> > > > > > > >
> > https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/docs/api/java/lang/invoke/MethodHandles.Lookup.html#defineClass-byte:A-
> > > > > > > > in the LocalBeanProxyFactory. There's likely a couple
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > other
> > > > > > > > libraries
> > > > > > > > that TomEE uses that do similar things, such as OWB and
> > > > > > > > OpenJPA,
> > > > > > > > so
> > > > > > > > we'll
> > > > > > > > need to check that they do the right thing in Java 17
> > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > well.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Jon
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 9:08 AM Zowalla, Richard <
> > > > > > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi ladies,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I wanted to start a discussion about TomEE and its
> > > > > > > > > Java
> > > > > > > > > 17
> > > > > > > > > compatibility.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I did some tests in one of our demo projects It looks
> > > > > > > > > like that
> > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > --illegal-access=permit" was removed in Java 17,
> > > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > leads to
> > > > > > > > > some InaccessibleObjectException [1].
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Does anybody know, if there are solutions /
> > > > > > > > > workarounds
> > > > > > > > > for it
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > Java
> > > > > > > > > 17 or do we need to fix it? If so: how? ;)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I bet, that many other frameworks / containers will
> > > > > > > > > run
> > > > > > > > > in this
> > > > > > > > > issue,
> > > > > > > > > so maybe someone already thought about a possible
> > > > > > > > > solution?
> > > > > > > > > Discussion
> > > > > > > > > seems to be "hot" [2].
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Gruss
> > > > > > > > > Richard
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > > >
> > https://gist.github.com/rzo1/5c1d0724a700e262a2e2824ded9f32ab
> > > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > > > https://twitter.com/delabassee/status/1438446396865224705
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > --
> > Richard Zowalla, M.Sc.
> > Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics
> >
> > Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences
> > Max-Planck-Str. 39
> > D-74081 Heilbronn
> > phone: +49 7131 504 6791 (zur Zeit nicht via Telefon erreichbar)
> > mail: [email protected]
> > web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/
> >
--
Richard Zowalla, M.Sc.
Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics

Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences
Max-Planck-Str. 39
D-74081 Heilbronn
phone: +49 7131 504 6791 (zur Zeit nicht via Telefon erreichbar)
mail: [email protected]
web: https://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/

Reply via email to