Yes - we already yanked it in 9.x Gruß Richard
Am Donnerstag, dem 05.05.2022 um 10:10 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Sounds good. I'll drop the transformer from the 8.x branch (looks > like we > don't use it in 9.x), and I'll create a single example to demonstrate > it in > a sandbox. > > Jon > > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:32 PM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > > > You are right - we can remove it imho from 8.x as we do not test > > with > > it and the transformed samples might not even work, e.g. > > dependencies > > are not migrated, etc. > > > > +1 for providing a (bigger) example. > > > > Gruß > > Richard > > > > Am Mittwoch, dem 04.05.2022 um 11:17 +0100 schrieb Jonathan > > Gallimore: > > > I've picked up a task related to the examples: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3873. I specifically > > > went > > > for > > > this, as I added the Eclipse Transformer to the build for a > > > number of > > > examples in the past, back when we were doing the transformation > > > process on > > > TomEE itself. The drawbacks here is that any tests in the > > > examples > > > run on > > > the javax code, and we just "assume" that the transformed > > > artifact > > > works. I > > > would suggest removing that for the master build, as it just > > > takes > > > build > > > time, and the examples should be transformed from javax to > > > jakarta at > > > source (if they aren't already). On the TomEE 8 build, we could > > > select a > > > few examples (no need to do them all) and find a way to run the > > > tests > > > on > > > both javax and jakarta versions of TomEE. > > > > > > Additionally, it would likely be useful to add documentation to > > > this. > > > If we > > > also wanted a bigger example application that specifically covers > > > transformation, I could look at that too. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > Jon > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 12:58 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I've been working for quite a long time on TomEE 9.x, and it's > > > > been > > > > more > > > > challenging and painful than I was expecting. I thought it > > > > would be > > > > good to > > > > give you some sort of status. > > > > > > > > I created a PR for the work. As a reminder, since Java EE moved > > > > to > > > > Eclipse > > > > to become Jakarta EE, we had a switch from javax.* namespace to > > > > jakarta.* > > > > namespace. This is an impacting change, since all applications > > > > and > > > > applications servers are built on top of it. > > > > > > > > In TomEE, we decided to do that change in TomEE. We had > > > > previously > > > > a > > > > bytecode change approach like an application could do. It > > > > worked > > > > and we > > > > were able to get certified. But it had a lot of limitations, so > > > > we > > > > had to > > > > do the migration in the code and fix all compatibility issues. > > > > > > > > Here is the PR https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/814 > > > > It has 90+ commits and nearly 5000 files touched (added, > > > > removed, > > > > updated). > > > > I understand it's a lot and it makes it almost impossible to > > > > review. But I > > > > did not see much approaches in this scenario to create smaller > > > > PRs. > > > > > > > > I created a Jenkins build though available at > > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/master-build-quick-9.x/ > > > > > > > > It makes it possible to track the progress. There have been > > > > steps > > > > forward > > > > and steps backward. > > > > > > > > All the code does not sit under TomEE, we use a bunch of third > > > > party > > > > projects and libraries. I have been able to contribute, publish > > > > jakarta > > > > compatible versions and get releases for some of them (Jakarta > > > > EE > > > > APIs Uber > > > > jar, Geronimo Connectors and Transaction Manager, Geronimo > > > > Config, > > > > Health, > > > > Metrics, OpenTracing, OpenAPI. OpenJPA, BVal, and OpenWebBeans > > > > will > > > > be > > > > released soon. > > > > > > > > The big parts is CXF, and ActiveMQ. I had to get them done in > > > > TomEE > > > > and > > > > update all group/artifact ids. It's under deps, alongside with > > > > SXC, > > > > DBCP, > > > > and others. > > > > > > > > In terms of removal, I tried to remove old stuff like SAAJ Axis > > > > 1 > > > > integration, JAX RPC, Management J2EE and a couple of other old > > > > things. > > > > > > > > A lot of other libraries got updated to their latest version > > > > when > > > > available > > > > in the new jakarta namespace. > > > > > > > > I'm starting to get all the build stable and many modules are > > > > passing now, > > > > including all CXF webservices, OpenEJB Core, and others. I can > > > > get > > > > a build > > > > and run TomEE. > > > > > > > > Goal is to get a green build asap so we can start working on > > > > TCK. > > > > The "quick" build is now green. Working on the full build. > > > > > > > > I'll soon be creating a branch for TomEE 8.x maintenance and > > > > merge > > > > the PR. > > > > I'm hoping we can then have small PRs or at least more people > > > > working in > > > > parallel. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
